Skip to comments.
Someone other than Cheney?
Posted on 07/07/2003 10:09:15 AM PDT by Lost and Confused
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-65 next last
My choice would be Rice. I like her and I think she would win some votes from the woman and african american communities that the dems rely on so much. Hopefully if Rice were nominated, the dems would panic and nominate Sharpton as their candidate to try to counter balance, but that is very wishful thinking. Plus she went to Stanford (where I hope to go in a year) :).
To: Lost and Confused
To: Lost and Confused
Cheney is the candidate. Period. The campaign is already started, the signs and stickers have been printed.
3
posted on
07/07/2003 10:13:17 AM PDT
by
SunStar
(Democrats piss me off!)
To: Lost and Confused
I believe the vice presidential candidate will and should be Dick Cheney.
I think he will be because it is in the nature of the Bush family to reward loyalty with with loyalty. It is their highest prized virtue.
I think he should be the candidate because Bush is not immortal and there is no one better to take the oath if it must be taken.
To: SunStar
5
posted on
07/07/2003 10:14:29 AM PDT
by
SunStar
(Democrats piss me off!)
To: Lost and Confused
I don't know if this has been discussed or not because I just signed up two weeks agoIt hasn't been discussed that often.
Only once a week or so, since the inauguration, at the most...
To: Lost and Confused
It's doubtful that anybody in recent decades has been a more valuable VP than Cheney, whose opinion seems to carry more weight than the typical VP. That will hold true for the next term as well as this one. The only reason to make Rice the candidate would be to promote her for the party's nomination in '08, but considering her prominence these days it may not be necessary to do that just to promote her candidacy.
As for Dem panic, they aren't going to panic over an election they know they're probably going to lose anyway. They'll put up a pair of sacrificial candidates, a la Mondale/Ferraro.
7
posted on
07/07/2003 10:18:59 AM PDT
by
squidly
To: Lost and Confused
First, the only reason that people question Richard Cheney as a viable Presidential candidate is because of his ticker, not his technical qualifications. Second, as much as I admire the intelligence and integrity of Condoleeza Rice, the plain truth is that the United States is not culturally ready for a black President, male or otherwise. It's an interesting notion, but it simply won't happen any time soon. That is just a fact of the culture and demographics of the US at the present time. If qualifications were considered only, Richard Cheney would be the man for the job, without question. I'd hire him in a second to manage money for me if I could afford his services.
8
posted on
07/07/2003 10:21:03 AM PDT
by
SpaceBar
To: Lost and Confused
If he were to change VP candidates I think he would lose at this point.
9
posted on
07/07/2003 10:21:41 AM PDT
by
Mfkmmof4
To: Lost and Confused
but how do you people feel?I feel fine . . . thanks for asking.
Who do you think should be the candidate and why?
Dick Chaney, because he's already the candidate.
I don't know if this has been discussed or not because I just signed up two weeks ago.
Adnauseam
If it has, just ignore this.
Too late
10
posted on
07/07/2003 10:25:03 AM PDT
by
w_over_w
(It's never too late for Caltrate!)
To: Lost and Confused
I know that Cheney has said that he will be the candidate again in 2004, but how do you people feel?This is a conservative site.
Conservatives "think".
Liberals "feel"
FR is not Oprah.
11
posted on
07/07/2003 10:25:11 AM PDT
by
Seeking the truth
(Hired Mercenary - Have Bullhorn - Will Shoutl for Freedom!)
To: Lost and Confused
If we'd just run GW Bush and Hillary, we'd get 80% of the popular vote and then she can be consigned to Minister of Bar Codes or something. /silly, horrible thought
12
posted on
07/07/2003 10:28:52 AM PDT
by
Sender
To: Lost and Confused
Ignore what?
BTW, when you go to Stamford, see if you can get someone to explain the difference in grammer over plural nouns. Why would we want woman vote?
13
posted on
07/07/2003 10:29:56 AM PDT
by
blackdog
(Who weeps for the tuna?)
To: blackdog
...explain the difference in grammer over plural nouns. Grammer is my fathers mother. I don't know what my Grammer has to do with plural nouns.
FMCDH
14
posted on
07/07/2003 10:35:06 AM PDT
by
nothingnew
(the pendulum swings and the libs are in the pit)
To: Sender
Now, that's funny.
To: Lost and Confused
Welcome to FR. In general, we post articles and then discuss them. Occasionally someone will get away with asking about restaurants in Peoria or some other stray thought, but it is usually considered bad form. And can elicit a flogging.
16
posted on
07/07/2003 10:36:03 AM PDT
by
Taliesan
To: blackdog
BTW, when you go to Stamford
Why would you want to go to Stamford? To see the World Wrestling Federation headquarters?
17
posted on
07/07/2003 10:36:08 AM PDT
by
lelio
To: Lost and Confused
I think Cheney ought to take himself off the ticket. Republicans will be missing a great opportunity if neither Rice nor Powell are in the VP slot.
18
posted on
07/07/2003 10:36:13 AM PDT
by
zook
To: Lost and Confused
19
posted on
07/07/2003 10:37:18 AM PDT
by
Zavien Doombringer
(Ain't nothing worse than feeling obsolete....)
To: zook
well possible health reasons may be a prob for cheney ..as far as 08 is concerned i thick rice is a great choice
20
posted on
07/07/2003 10:38:12 AM PDT
by
rrrod
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-65 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson