Skip to comments.
In taped interrogation, Westerfield tells police 'my life is over'
San Diego Union Tribune ^
| January 7, 2003
Posted on 01/08/2003 9:24:19 AM PST by TomB
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,461-1,480, 1,481-1,500, 1,501-1,520 ... 1,541-1,560 next last
To: ~Kim4VRWC's~
Does this mean you have "reasonable" doubt? Or would you like to tell me your reason for following this thread? That way I wouldn't have to make the logical assumption.
To: ~Kim4VRWC's~
I've not seen you participate in the bs that goes on. Actually, the only bs I see here is when someone tries to discuss the case and the whole VanDamClan shows up to hurl insults.
To: redlipstick
(I'm just relieved they haven't guessed that I'm actually David Westerfield's 1st ex-wife!)Westerfield was married to Nancy Grace?????
To: demsux
Are you saying that only people who have reasonable doubt can post here?
I don't check the thread daily anymore..haven't a long time.
I do want to follow the case, but my motives have changed.. It use to be because I believed he was more guilty than not guilty..but I wasn't 100% positive. Now i want to figure out why others don't see what the jury saw. You don't see me in here cramming my opinions down your throat.
To: demsux
I can see it's time for the hourly post.
To: ~Kim4VRWC's~
Are you saying that only people who have reasonable doubt can post here?Nope, just can't understand why you, cyncooper or reddipstick do...
To: countess
As ucansee2 and some others have pointed out.. there is need for discussion between both sides..but something keeps getting in the way.
To: demsux
From my standpoint...
"i want to figure out why others don't see what the jury saw. "
G'nite...
To: ~Kim4VRWC's~
BTW, go ahead and post any freepmails from me.
Mighty cowardly friend you have there, kimmie...allows his/her freepmail to be posted, but doesn't have the nads to own up to it...very classy
To: countess
Can't do the hourly post right now, Courtv coming on!
To: demsux
Dems, if that person revealed it, then that person would have been out of the loop. That person didn't want to be out of the loop.
To: ~Kim4VRWC's~
Like I said, classy freeper
To: ~Kim4VRWC's~
I've not seen you participate in the bs that goes on. What a wimpy little mole. Obviously, you like people like that.
To: demsux
Depends on your definition of class I guess. I would suggest that the messages he was receiving were classless.
G'nite for real!
To: countess
see my last post..
g'nite
To: demsux
btw, I used the pronoun he in the generic sense..
To: ~Kim4VRWC's~
Good night!
To: ~Kim4VRWC's~
FWIW, I don't care about your sophmoric freep mail exchanges, but remember this...you lay down with dogs and you will get fleas.
AND I still think your "source" is a spineless, cowardly, butt-kisser...
Nite
To: demsux
She's probably making it up.
To: demsux
One thing I've never understood was the area where Danielle's body was left. As I picture it, it's at the top of a steep cliff that would have been very difficult to climb on your own and nearly impossible carrying a body. Plus the obvious chance of being observed. I read there's a dirt (bike) path at the top that had a big motor home been driven up there, it would have had to back the entire way to the main road. Why, with all the other places more convenient and possibly the body never discovered, would DW put it there. Makes no sense. One of many questions I still have.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,461-1,480, 1,481-1,500, 1,501-1,520 ... 1,541-1,560 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson