Skip to comments.
Fox talk show host calls for disbarment of Westerfield lawyers('Cause He was Really Guilty)
Court TV ^
| Harriet Ryan
Posted on 09/19/2002 7:03:56 PM PDT by Jalapeno
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 341-360, 361-380, 381-400, 401-410 next last
To: John Jamieson
381
posted on
09/22/2002 6:29:53 PM PDT
by
Valpal1
To: Valpal1
To: John Jamieson
BTW, he was booked for both arrest on the same date according to this.
383
posted on
09/22/2002 6:33:20 PM PDT
by
Valpal1
To: Valpal1
Will bookmark for tomorrow. Have migraine and the visual disturbances make it hard to read now. G'night.
384
posted on
09/22/2002 6:35:22 PM PDT
by
Valpal1
To: Valpal1
Feel better.
To: Valpal1
JJ, you are soooo lazy!!!
Why would you say that? I spent many hours on google but couldn't find it.
I know he's still there, I just found the current inmates list, but it still doesn't tell me if he was in jail on 2/1.
To: Valpal1
He was arrested by two different agencies on 1/27: SDPD and USM. The charges were later increased for the 13 year old. I don't know if the bail was changed then or not.
If we can't find anything, so be it, we tried. We know Rowland was loose on 2/1. We also know that they were long time buddies and shared children. It looks like they're going to be tried together.
To: John Jamieson
There are some things about Damon VanDam that are still bothering me. It's been questioned before about how they maintained their lifestyle on his salary. Where did the money come from? Drugs? Porn?
On the trip with his Florida friend to "look for Danielle", I was thinking it was just a day trip but recently read he nearly had a breakdown after returning and Brenda said something about it being so hard for him to be away from his family and not have their support. How many days was he gone? Where did he go and where did he stay? He also made some wierd statement when he returned about not finding anything and "I wish this whole thing was just over with". Maybe somebody remembers. I continue to think Damon is tied into whatever happened to Danielle.
Also regarding DW taking all the blame if there were other people involved, I remember some speculation about threats against his family if he talked. There could be something to that, maybe, maybe not.
Thanks for hanging in there with your investigation. Hopefully we can know the whole story in our lifetime.
To: Valpal1
Det. Redden and FBI criminal profilers will tell you those are the weasel words of guilt conflicting with fear of punishment. He didn't make confindent and strong denials, because he didn't "feel" innocent! These types of sexual killers working in tandem or cooperatively with one another is extremeley RARE. DW did this crime as the culmination of years of peeping, skulking, and fantasizing. He finally acted out his desires and you can bet he didn't invite any helpers who might interfere with his violence/control fantasies by wanting to do differently according to their fantasies (this is why they seldom seek partners in these crimes). He is the perfect example of escalating depravity.
Well, it seems to me that Westerfield would have had plenty of time and a better opportunity to peep, skulk, and fantasize over Danielle by getting closer to her mom.
Obviously, Danielle was interested in the pool. Inviting her and friends over for a pool party would seem like a first step, if Westerfield was the monster you describe.
This would make more sense than the "kill her at first sight" idiocy that some corrupt LE personnel contrived.
To: I. Ben Hurt
Keep the ideas churning! We're are going to come up with something that really fits one of these days. No way do we know the whole story!
To: CW_Conservative
Somebody ratted out Whitmore (and possibly Rowland?) on 1/25.
What if DW ratted out Whitmore & Rowland. Could they have killed Danielle and planted a little evidence on DW while they were at it? The perfect crime.
What if the van Dam's had ratted out W&R? Punish the vDs and blame it on DW?
To: Valpal1
Val, thank you for the ping to that info. Will check into it as well.
To: John Jamieson
I sent you that info about the address connected with the URN addie fresno posted from e-bay... that's a clue. It was connected with the pedophile in prison.
Now why do you think the pedophile in prison would be connected to the DW trial?
To: John Jamieson
That scenario could be one possible explanation for Keith or Rich's comment to Dw at Dad's: We know what you're up to.
I think it was part of Brenda's testimony. Interesting that there was little follow-up on that. You'd think they'd want to explore DW's possible motivation.
But then, if they were avoiding getting close to other investigations that were happening at the same time.....
To: John Jamieson
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/645874/posts?page=1,100
In our quest to build a memorial to Daniells memory, we are asking for your support. Together, you and I can reach our goal of creating and maintaining a glorious memorial to little Daniells memory. By purchasing and Earth Urn, a percentage of the funds raised will go directly into an account for the purpose of creating this memorial.
Earth Urns
1093 E. Main Street
Suite 192 El Cajon CA. 92021
Contact us at earthurns@cox.net
http://www.wired.com/news/politics/0,1283,48929,00.html
Det. Kertson also advised me that a search warrant served on Bolanders mailing address, 1093 East Main Street, El Cajon, California yielded as envelope addressed to Mikel Bolander, postmarked 1/1/95 Rochester, NY. This envelope contained a 3 1/2" computer floppy disk. Upon review of the information on the disk, Det. Kertson told me it contained a letter from LB and two digitized photos of a nude young boy. SNIP
The envelope is addressed to Mikel Bolander, 1093 East Main St. #130, El Cajon, California 92021. This envelope was given to Det. Kertson by California State Parole Agent Maritza Rodriguez. Parole Agent Rodriguez obtained the envelope as a result of a parole search on Bolanders mailing address, 1093 East Main St., El Cajon, California. The disk was downloaded and it contained the following photos: One photo depicts a young male under the age of 18 having anal/genital contact with an adult male
To: John Jamieson
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&q=Mikel+Bolander&btnG=Google+Search
They tried to claim that the detectives messsed up the harddrive on defendants computer...yet another case of conspiracies, lies and innuendos.
If a federal prosecutor ever wanted to offer a disquieting example of a child pornographer, it would be Mikel James Bolander. Bolander, 37, is a convicted, self-confessed pedophile who dabbles in child porn. He is incarcerated in the Metropolitan Correctional Center, a federal prison in San Diego. http://www.wired.com/news/politics/0,1283,49083,00.html
To: tetelestai; Ditter; ChiefRon; Starshine; UCANSEE2; Mrs.Liberty; Jaded; skipjackcity; BARLF; ...
Would like to hear your comments about my posts above.. (See #'s 395-396)
To: Dante3
In addition, Feldman repeatedly implied that the Van Dams use of marijuana made them unfit parents when in reality Feldman is a marijuana advocate who takes cases pro bono in defense of Marijuana law reform. He's a pig in and out.
398
posted on
09/23/2002 7:51:34 AM PDT
by
Hildy
To: ~Kim4VRWC's~
The problem these DW defenders have is that they take all the statements of Feldman about improper LE behavior as gospel truth instead of with a grain of salt.
Every Defense lawyer calls into question the behavior of LE, because it's a fast way to derail evidence against their client. Everyone in jail is innocent and there because of dirtly LE and the corrupt judicial system.
It's a tiresome mantra.
399
posted on
09/23/2002 8:27:59 AM PDT
by
Valpal1
To: CW_Conservative
Ooh, a pool party in February. What a great idea! /sarcasm
Apparently, you choose to ignore the reports that DW has been a peeper and a skulker for decades. Could the "We know what you're about" comment by Rich or Keith been in regards to his known unsavory behavior?
DW is a deviant who finally acted out. That's the picture painted by all the information released.
400
posted on
09/23/2002 8:32:38 AM PDT
by
Valpal1
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 341-360, 361-380, 381-400, 401-410 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson