Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Word For The Day, Tuesday, 9/17/02
The Verbivores | 9/17/02 | Teacher

Posted on 09/17/2002 4:59:40 AM PDT by RikaStrom

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220221-240241-260261-277 next last
To: SeaDragon; hobbes1
looks like he needs more encouragement, sea. what can you think of....?
221 posted on 09/17/2002 10:30:26 AM PDT by xsmommy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 217 | View Replies]

To: xsmommy
ooks like he needs more encouragement, sea. what can you think of....?

Oh, I can think of all kinds............

222 posted on 09/17/2002 10:32:12 AM PDT by SeaDragon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 221 | View Replies]

To: SeaDragon; hobbes1
well have at it!!!
223 posted on 09/17/2002 10:33:47 AM PDT by xsmommy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 222 | View Replies]

To: Sword_of_Gideon
I am looking at 3 or 4 different approximations to calculating the cutoff frequency in microwave waveguides & then comparing those calculations to simulated data.....

Dig out ol' Jackson, dude...

I kinda liked the waveguide stuff. Never had occasion to use it but it was kinda, uh, fun messing around with all the T and R equations...

/flaming geek

224 posted on 09/17/2002 10:35:11 AM PDT by maxwell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 164 | View Replies]

To: RikaStrom
Here's another one.... The nescient Mr. Wellfare (I mean Wellstone) appears to be trailing Norm. One of the things I hated about moving away from Minnesota (& it wasn't the taxes) was having the opportunity to vote this little amoebae out of office. Take him Norm!
225 posted on 09/17/2002 10:35:27 AM PDT by Sword_of_Gideon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xsmommy; SeaDragon
well have at it!!!

Bring Help. And Pack a lunch ; )

226 posted on 09/17/2002 10:36:19 AM PDT by hobbes1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 223 | View Replies]

To: Sword_of_Gideon
Alright! Coleman,Cronyn,Forrester,Dole,Alexander,Thune et al. = Senate Minority Leader Dasshole, and more importantly Judiciary Comittee Ranking Member Leahy!
227 posted on 09/17/2002 10:38:40 AM PDT by hobbes1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 225 | View Replies]

To: doubled
Oh no, not me! LOL
228 posted on 09/17/2002 10:43:11 AM PDT by RikaStrom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 213 | View Replies]

To: dubyaismypresident
OH yeah... ain't that the truth.

A+

229 posted on 09/17/2002 10:43:42 AM PDT by RikaStrom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 215 | View Replies]

To: *Students
Ok kiddies, you are on your own again. I am going back to the salt mines.

Later!

230 posted on 09/17/2002 10:44:46 AM PDT by RikaStrom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 229 | View Replies]

To: maxwell
Well, it's much easier now days to manipulate the equations with the aid of Mathcad (what I would have given back in my college days for a PC, simulation software, and Mathcad).
231 posted on 09/17/2002 10:46:58 AM PDT by Sword_of_Gideon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 224 | View Replies]

To: hobbes1
Bring Help. And Pack a lunch ; )

In your dreams that I would need help but lunch might not be a bad idea.

;-)

232 posted on 09/17/2002 10:51:15 AM PDT by SeaDragon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 226 | View Replies]

To: SeaDragon
Well, I suppose if you were bereft of help I could go easy on you.
233 posted on 09/17/2002 10:55:28 AM PDT by hobbes1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 232 | View Replies]

To: Sword_of_Gideon
True, very true.

If you can tolerate the "funky" way (in a Zen Macintosh/Apple/unix-ish almost pattern) that MathCAD forces you to try to edit and write equations.

Always felt that program was set up to "write" pretty equations and display them for papers, rather than help you make massive numbers of accurate calculations.

So I more often turn to Excel or JMP-In by SAS for quick equation estimating.

Still, since most of my stuff is CAD/layout/error-checking and fixes , I don't need as much "pure mathematics" as number-crunching.
234 posted on 09/17/2002 11:00:57 AM PDT by Robert A Cook PE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 231 | View Replies]

To: SeaDragon
Thought you couldn't go eat tigers for lunch because you were tied up in chains at your desk.
235 posted on 09/17/2002 11:02:00 AM PDT by Robert A Cook PE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 232 | View Replies]

To: hobbes1

Well, I suppose if you were bereft of help I could go easy on you.

Oh, please, don't do me any favors............

;~)

236 posted on 09/17/2002 11:06:09 AM PDT by SeaDragon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 233 | View Replies]

To: Robert A. Cook, PE
I don't normally need pure number crunching either, so normally Mathcad is fine. But I know exactly what you mean as far as the funky way in which they force you to input the equations. I am constantly having to use dummy placeholders, cut & paste pieces of equations, use a lot of parenthesis, etc, just to input my equations. It does look nice, though if you can minimize your equations, add graphs, drawings, & text (but then who has time?).... maybe I will & then make sure the boss gets a copy.

I've never used JMP-In before. I've used Matlab a couple of times years ago & use Excel regularly for sorting data & doing simple calculations.
237 posted on 09/17/2002 11:20:01 AM PDT by Sword_of_Gideon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 234 | View Replies]

To: Sword_of_Gideon
Got Jmp-in for use in my statistics classes for a QA Masters.

It's got useable, but not exotic, graph and equation-creator/display functions: given a group of several relationships (sets of points), and one or more relationships you need an equation for it will do a wonderful job of showing the points, "outliars", trial fits, fit parameters, and various formats of potential solutions.

Best for QA and statistics analysis of the data. Certainly not as exotic as many statistics-pure programs, but its also much cheaper at well under 100.00 (maybe 78.00 Don't remember.)
238 posted on 09/17/2002 11:37:22 AM PDT by Robert A Cook PE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 237 | View Replies]

To: RikaStrom
The Dems, intent upon blocking our President in any endeavor, including national security, remain nescient of American support of the Bush Doctrine. This ignorance of the will of the American people as regards Saddam and the War on Terror will cost them dearly in November.
239 posted on 09/17/2002 12:33:14 PM PDT by .30Carbine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Robert A. Cook, PE
Got Jmp-in for use in my statistics classes for a QA Masters.

Following the T-n-A PhD of course ; )

240 posted on 09/17/2002 12:35:59 PM PDT by hobbes1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 238 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220221-240241-260261-277 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson