Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Fried Eggs
Desert Post Weekly ^ | 12 September 2002

Posted on 09/16/2002 10:52:55 AM PDT by JediGirl

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 221-224 next last
To: Inge_CAV
HEY! It was my thighs that were being discussed, lol!
41 posted on 09/16/2002 11:55:01 AM PDT by JediGirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Inge_CAV
And I thought this thread was about breasts.....

I have big, flappy man-teats, if that helps...
42 posted on 09/16/2002 11:56:54 AM PDT by WindMinstrel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: JediGirl
Darn, and I missed it. : )
43 posted on 09/16/2002 11:58:47 AM PDT by Inge_CAV
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: JediGirl
First: I have never used an illegal drug in my life.

Second: I have no use for anyone who does illegal drugs

Third: If someone causes an accident while under the influence they should be punished to the fullest extent the law allows.

Fourth: Outside of the third statement, it is none of my business what someone else does to his or her brain. There is no law against stupidity.

Now if this is truly a war on drugs, how long is it to be waged? What is the exit strategy? Who defines that the war is won? What Constitutional protections are to be ignored in this war? Does the war on drugs simply increase the cost of illegal drugs thereby increasing the criminal element? Would there be as many drug related crimes if the profit were eliminated? How much will a $200/day habit cost if the criminal element is removed.

Again, I have nothing but distain for a drug user but I am unwilling to sacrifice Constitutional protections to attempt (and fail) to save an idiot from them self. They are all potential Darwin Award contestants.

44 posted on 09/16/2002 11:58:55 AM PDT by Wurlitzer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dane
Yes the donations are voluntary, but that still doesn't negate the facts that socialist Soros is a big donor(probably the biggest) to the pro-drug side.

And why is that significant? Your desire to make the source of the donations the only relevant issue seems calculated to give you the advantage of being able to present a one-sided argument. You can point to Soros, or any other contributor and find something about them you can use to prejudice the issue. OTOH, the opposition to drug law reform is financed from the world's bigges slush fund - the federal budget. Who funds the opposition? Everyone, and no one. You can talk about how much money Soros has contributed without worrying about anyone pointing out how much the government has spend supporting the campaign to defeat the proposals because we don't know and probably can't find out. The federal budget is such a mess it can't even be audited.

It's a clever dodge, but it's still a dodge.

45 posted on 09/16/2002 11:59:09 AM PDT by tacticalogic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Wurlitzer
Into pianos?
46 posted on 09/16/2002 12:00:04 PM PDT by JediGirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: WindMinstrel
Thanks for offering but I will pass.
47 posted on 09/16/2002 12:04:12 PM PDT by Inge_CAV
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

Comment #48 Removed by Moderator

To: Wurlitzer
Again, I have nothing but distain for a drug user but I am unwilling to sacrifice Constitutional protections to attempt (and fail) to save an idiot from them self. They are all potential Darwin Award contestants.

Sorry, Wurlitzer, but on these threads, if you post against the WoD you are automatically labeled a druggie. Easier for them to fit their little minds around it like that
49 posted on 09/16/2002 12:04:43 PM PDT by WindMinstrel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

Comment #50 Removed by Moderator

Comment #51 Removed by Moderator

Comment #52 Removed by Moderator

To: JediGirl
Well, looks like I owe you an apology.

After looking over recent threads on which you've posted it looks like you're into MORE than just drugs: Drugs (still No. 1), defending pornography, and militan vegetarianism (a.k.a. Veganism).

Well, FR needs more "colorful" characters, so I guess you'll do.

53 posted on 09/16/2002 12:15:37 PM PDT by Illbay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

Comment #54 Removed by Moderator

To: WindMinstrel
"Sorry, Wurlitzer, but on these threads, if you post against the WoD you are automatically labeled a druggie. Easier for them to fit their little minds around it like that "

Yes, I hear you! Attacking the person is easier than attacking the message. That is why I rarely post on WoD threads, way too much hate and not enough legitimate debate.

55 posted on 09/16/2002 12:18:37 PM PDT by Wurlitzer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Illbay
Vegetarianism can include dairy products and seafood. Veganism does not. Defending porn? Oh, you mean defending personal freedom. I'd better stop doing that! And don't forget my occasional dip into the creation/evolution threads.
56 posted on 09/16/2002 12:18:51 PM PDT by JediGirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Ed B.
You defined my thought much better than I did. Thanks.
57 posted on 09/16/2002 12:20:06 PM PDT by Wurlitzer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Bill D. Berger
If you disagree with him, you are a socialist

Well call me a socialist and execute me at dawn.

58 posted on 09/16/2002 12:21:41 PM PDT by AUgrad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: JediGirl
JediGirl, I admire your persistence in finding and posting articles that point out how ludicrous is the War on Drugs. I am amazed how so many 'conservatives' here blithely ignore how the federal government is getting involved in matters that are best left to the individual states. Indeed, the U.S. government is usurping the Constitution by doing so (nothing new there, eh?).

I don't know if you saw this, but it's an excellent synopsis of the effects of cannabis, and debunks many of the myths being foisted upon the American people by Walters, Hutchinson, et al.

The Benefits of Marijuana

59 posted on 09/16/2002 12:24:49 PM PDT by be-baw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: be-baw
Good and informative. Thanks for the link.
60 posted on 09/16/2002 12:33:11 PM PDT by JediGirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 221-224 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson