Fried Eggs

Desert Post Weekly ^ | 12 September 2002

[Dane]

It seems to me you are the one who wants state intervention, not us Libertines.

Ruh roh, you have committed a major faux pas amongst your "Libertarian" brethren in that you have admitted that you are a Libertine.

Oh well, I knew that the truth would finally come out.

I have seen post after post with "(L)libertarians" on FR saying they were not "Libertine"(anarchists).

Well at least you were honest.

[Dakmar]

To Hell with useless debates, it's time for a good name-calling. Ummmmm, troublemaker. You heard me, you are a troublemaker. Yes, I called you that, now what are you going to do about it? Huh? Punk, I didn't think so. Call me names, will ya?

[Hemingway's Ghost]

Why should conservatives be interested in jumping in bed with socialist and Hillary friend George Soros in the quest to validate drugs?

We're not interested in it. It makes us sick. But just because we happen to agree with your favorite socialists that the War on Drugs is insane doesn't mean we're "jumping into bed with them" on some quixotic quest to validate drugs, whatever you mean by that. Put it this way---do you support personal gun ownership, that other iron-clad bastion of conservatism? So do mafia hit men. It makes their job much easier. Do you believe this means Second Amendment advocates forged a deliberate, long-term alliance with mafia hit men? Are Second Amendment advocates now part-and-parcel of the mafia hit man union?

Of course not. The notion is ridiculous. And for the last time, so is your laughable Soros For It = I'm Against It brand of conservatism.

I've answered yours, now you answer mine. Without asking me another question. If the answer's so obvious, pill it. Either you're right or all of us are. Convince us that as conservatives, we should see things your way.

Why should conservatives interested in shrinking the size and influence of the federal government support the War on Drugs? Why should conservatives interested in returning this nation to a constitutional republic support the War on Drugs?

[Dakmar]

What does "quixotic" mean?

[dcwusmc]

" Why should conservatives interested in shrinking the size and influence of the federal government support the War on Drugs? Why should conservatives interested in returning this nation to a constitutional republic support the War on Drugs?"

[tacticalogic]

" Why should conservatives interested in shrinking the size and influence of the federal government support the War on Drugs? Why should conservatives interested in returning this nation to a constitutional republic support the War on Drugs?"

I don't think you'll get an answer, because the question won't register coherently. Near as I can tell, we're dealing with a politically liberal social conservative. I don't think Dane wants a conservative government, but a conservative society. To the end, (s)he wants a government with enought authority and power, and leaders with the inclination to produce it, at gunpoint if necessary. Wheather or not it's "constitutional" is irrelevant, and any talk of limiting the federal government's power is out of the question until we have it.

[dcwusmc]

I know what you mean... NONE of the WODDIES will answer those questions, nor the one about whose body it is.... Possibly we are dealing with one of those mass hallucination cases. Maybe bad dope and they feel the urge to do dirt to everyone until they get to the dealer that sold them the bad stuff.... Dane, truth be told, doesn't seem to have an original idea in it's head... maybe it's a talking monkey or something.

[Dakmar]

I heard Dane used to be a crack whore before (s)he died. Que sera sera.

[f.Christian]

WOS(sanity/sobriety/society)...the druggies are winning!

[Dakmar]

WarOnReality/FlatEarthersFlatOutLosing. ---->Heliocentric model threatens pre-newtonians!

[f.Christian]

Flat liners(brain waves)...you!

[Dakmar]

You sparkle, sunshine, like a fresh diamond. How could I compare?

[f.Christian]

Sparkle/sanity warriors!

[Dakmar]

I like Rush 2112:

http://www.leoslyrics.com/listlyrics.php?sid=%96Q%CF3%5EeD%F7

You really should listen to it if you haven't before.

[jenny65]

And a big chunk of those contributions come from socialist and Hillary friend George Soros.

Please show me a correllation between socialism and drugs. Forget personalities. I'm talking philosophy here. What's the connection? Is RE-legalizing drugs synonymous with socialism or communism? If not, this is a pointless argument.

[Dane]

And Dane, that is why I appreciate you so. Every day you convince another person on FR who was still on the fence that there is no logic or reason behind the drug war, only emotion. Thanks for all you do to help the cause of dismantling the War on Some Drugs!

And I appreciate you all also. Everyday you show the lurkers that you are in political bed with socialists such as George Soros and don't have the terminity to admit it and give piddly little excuses, such as "it doesn't matter", when the fact is that the pro-drug side is being fueled by leftists.

[Dane]

"Why should conservatives interested in shrinking the size and influence of the federal government support the War on Drugs? Why should conservatives interested in returning this nation to a constitutional republic support the War on Drugs?

And again, why should conservatives be interested in jumping in the political bed with socialists such as George Soros and such marxist communes such as Santa Cruz, CA, where pot and other drugs are glorified.