Judge Mudd Refuses Sequester Plea: Westerfield Jury Verdict In Sep? (Aug. 16th Verdict Watch)

Union Trib ^ | August 15, 2002 | Jeff Dillion/Steve Perez

[NatureGirl]

The conspiracies about satanism, using danielle as a sex toy amongst her parents and friends

And this couldn't possibly exist but one guy "collecting kiddie porn" does, right?

Swingers aren't well-placed people (ex-cops etc.)? Well, that'll be news to the head of NASCA! You may read up on him at your leisure, not that I expect that you will.

I'm predicting that there'll be some errands coming up in your future...

[Freedom2specul8]

How can you consider it random?

[KnutCase]

Are you sure he was chosen at random or intentionally selected?

[the Deejay]

Well, I cannot imagine what Doosuk was thinking by
bringing out the rope, after the "lynch mobs" had
just been stated by Feldman.

[Valpal1]

My apologies.

[pinz-n-needlez]

Well said, connect, thank you very much.

It's good to be reminded of the common sense basis of DW's innocence, espcially after a night like last night where we all buried one another in details. :-)

I lost the jury pool, lol, but still think that DW will win his freedom - and rightly so!

[Freedom2specul8]

NOTICE: the defense did not deny all the child porn. Just questioned SOME of the ages. The bottom line will be what the jury saw and heard. What made them cry?

[NatureGirl]

I'll make another prediction - that if we end up in a "no-holds barred" room, we'll be minus one poster double-quick!

Just a guess. Could just be one of those wacky, not-cool conspiracy theories though. ;-)

[small_l_libertarian]

Excellent post.

[Freedom2specul8]

I'm predicting that the child porn is going to hurt him.

[PrairieDawg]

pyx,
Hi. Regarding the hair on the headboard - since it was a match via mitachondrial DNA couldn't it have been BRENDA's hair and not Danielle's? Perhaps Brenda and Dave had a fling in the MH and then Dave wanted to "upgrade" to Duh-knees (the "little one") at the bar - which ticked Brenda off. When asked "who could have done this" she came up with Dave since she was still ticked off at him. (heck - she may TRUELY NOT REMEMBER as she does a fair amount of booze and pot...).

Just a thought to ponder....

My take on this case is that the prosecution's case is a "target rich environment" - they haven't proved SPIT, IMHO.

FRegards,
PrairieDawg

[ican'tbelieveit]

Whether it makes them cry or not, it may not be a crime.

[bvw]

Someone had to be the fall guy, in that sense random -- if Westerfield had happened to be on some extended vacation at the time, it would have been someone else. Maybe the new nabes.

The detectives seemed to have been on Westie for hugging and kissing purposes. Hugging him for a stroyline to weave in, and kissing him with evidence. JMO.

[Politicalmom]

WHAT trial have you been watching? Feldy challenged the jury to look at all the "child porn", which means he doesn't think it IS child porn.

[KnutCase]

My thought is that Dusek had already selected his props before beginning closing arguments, didn't have enough common sense to leave that one out.

[NatureGirl]

The jury didn't cry. The alternates (two of 'em) did. To me, that would instantly make them unacceptable as jurors - too sensitive, when inner strength is called for. If they found that so upsetting how could they be trusted to not put their hands over their ears/eyes during bug testimony?

Oh, wait...

[the Deejay]

Juries, judges & attorneys are not suppose to cry. The
courtroom is not a funeral parlor.

[ican'tbelieveit]

Kim has admitted to missing the closing arguments.

[NatureGirl]

So what's your prediction on the bug testimony?

[Freedom2specul8]

"I'll make another prediction - that if we end up in a "no-holds barred" room, we'll be minus one poster double-quick!"


LOL~ It's unbelievable the lengths some will go to...isn't it. Gotta shove one's ideas, philosophies, opinions and truths right down the throat of another, even if ya gotta kick their ass to do it right?