Jurors To Hear Recorded Westerfield Tapes: Mudd Still Wrestling With Media! (VERDICT WATCH-Aug.14th)

Union Trib ^ | August 14, 2002 | San Diego Staff

[UCANSEE2]

I have seen and followed many of Billy Bob's posts.

However I agree with DEMSUX on this.

When BB said what he did, all I could think of was "THE DISRUPTOR SQUAD". BB sounded just like Greg Weston ,SinkSpur,Poohbah,DEFIANT. You know, the HIT AND RUN SQUAD.

And BB did just like they do. Come on the thread, spew hate and ignorance, then run off.

As much as I like/respect B.B. he did make a poor showing.

[NatureGirl]

THEY MUST FIND DW guilty JUST BECAUSE "WE KNOW HE DID IT".

Well, that settles it. Dusek "believes" DW to be guilty, and said he "didn't have to prove it", so we should just all clam up and stop debating the issue - Dusek is God and his faith in DW's guilt trumps everything, including bugs. < /sarcasm>

[Freedom2specul8]

LOL!

[carenot]

"Surely Westerfield testified to his innocence at the trial. He could have explained it easily."

I am here late to the case but Westerfield didn't testify.

And the expert wasn't sure the stain was blood. Much less who's it was. Also no blood was found on the comforter.

Why didn't the investigators find any of the little girl's fingerprints anywhere in the house she lived in?

As I said, I am new to the case and have not been reading about it except for yesterday and today.

If I am wrong about anything I said, please correct me.

[Krodg]

Q UP UNTIL THAT TIME AND EVEN NOW, DO YOU RECALL ACCESSING ANY PORNOGRAPHY ON THE 4TH OF FEBRUARY? A NO.

Somebody slap that young man up side his head with a Playboy or tell him to pull his head out of his...

[UCANSEE2]

What was it I heard someone say about a family member discussing the case.

When asked about how illogical things were in the case? How logic showed DW couldn't have done it.

THe persons' response was something to the effect of "well, why use logic with such an illogical person as DW".

[Freedom2specul8]

I hope not. He needs help if he does..this is the last place he needs to be.

[NatureGirl]

Oh, Rheo. Don't even try. Dusek HAS SPOKEN! Therefore we must all believe.

After all, "we saw it on TV - it must be true."--Conrad Brean, "Wag the Dog"

[JudyB1938]

Amazing at how somebody who's "new to the case" can have so much figured out. Could it mean you are using your common sense instead of relying on the media. Well, THAT'S a given!

[Freedom2specul8]

He doesn't have to show that...

Why?

[pinz-n-needlez]

Just in case the jury comes in today, and these threads dissapates, I want to ask you something...

Does your caps lock key just engage on its own periodically?

Or do you have a tic in your little finger? LOL

Are you related to Aloha Ronnie?? There are some mysteries of the universe that need to be answered. :-)

[UCANSEE2]

So yes, the prosecutions whole case has been based on INSINUATION of RAPE

Here's the Prosecution's whole case.

To find him guilty of murder, you must find that he kidnapped her. To find him guilty of kidnapping you must find that he killed her.

She is dead, therefore he killed her. THerefore he is guilty of kidnapping. Therefore he is guilty of murder. Oh, and we threw in the PORN cause we just wanted an excuse to see it legally.

[pinz-n-needlez]

"Oh, and we threw in the PORN cause we just wanted an excuse to see it legally. "

You just explained the whole 8 weeks. And the jury has spent the day inspecting the porn, including Danielle L.'s picture.

I can just see Church Lady rendering a verdict on this.

[Freedom2specul8]

Child porn, not porn..you would be DISGUSTED if you found out your neighbor had it...and then you would want to know if he or she does some thing else disgusting wouldn't ya.

[ican'tbelieveit]

Which goes back to the point about putting a man to death over this. Where is the proof that Danielle was kidnapped, raped, or killed? Those are a lot of insinuations to "accept."

But it is much harder to accept the insinuation that a child would be curious and play in a motorhome.

[Rheo]

The blood was ID'd as hers.

No blood on comforter..none of her DNA or trace found in shower drain...or mattress pad

No dogs hit in his house or MH or SUV.

All of the unidentified prints in the house..bannister..garage door..slider door..patio table....desk NEXT TO HER BED!

Unidentified 7cm coarse dark brown hair found under her body that WAS NOT run thru the offender database.

The blood in VD garage that was unreportable for DNA...was it bleached??

All the unidentified hairs found in the MH and only the one hair of hers in the sink DRAIN TRAP..anybody checked theirs after moving into a house..(sick)

[MagnoliaMS]

Thanks, Kim. I had been having exactly the same problem as Duan. Nothing would show up under "Westerfield" or "Van Dam."

[UCANSEE2]

Does your caps lock key just engage on its own periodically?

Too many dESPERADO sNACKS in my keyboard!

Actually, from what I understand, CAPS mean you are SHOUTING! Sometimes, from the way people seem to have a hard time seeing the obvious, I begin to think they didn't HEAR me, SO I YELL! (gonna have to get a new kbyd soon, this one sticks.)

[fatima]

Wow

[the Deejay]

Maybe this, from Feldman's closing, will assist us in the jury asking for the LE interview tape.

MR. FELDMAN: LOOK TO DAVID WESTERFIELD'S STATEMENT TO PAUL REDDEN. LOOK TO DAVID WESTERFIELD'S STATEMENT TO JOHNNY KEENE. WE KNOW THE KIDS WERE IN THE GARAGE. I THINK THAT'S WHAT HE TOLD KEENE. I THINK THAT'S WHAT HE TOLD REDDEN. TAKE A LOOK. MR. DUSEK INVITED YOU TO DO SO. I ENCOURAGE YOU TO DO SO. LISTEN TO THOSE TAPES, PLEASE. BECAUSE ONE THING THAT WILL SCREAM OUT TO YOU IS THE DEMEANOR OF MR. WESTERFIELD ON TAPE IS COMPLETELY INCONSISTENT WITH ANY NIGHTMARE YOU MAY HAVE ABOUT A PERSON WHO WOULD DO SOMETHING LIKE THIS. THE KIDS ARE ALL OVER. AND THERE'S THE TRACE. AND WHEN THE LAUNDRY GETS DROPPED DOWN, IT'S NO SURPRISE IT GETS PICKED UP AND POPPED INTO THE LAUNDROMAT.

Feldman literally begged the jury to listen to the tapes.