Skip to comments.
Jurors To Hear Recorded Westerfield Tapes: Mudd Still Wrestling With Media! (VERDICT WATCH-Aug.14th)
Union Trib ^
| August 14, 2002
| San Diego Staff
Posted on 08/13/2002 10:12:33 PM PDT by FresnoDA
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 381-400, 401-420, 421-440 ... 981-991 next last
To: ~Kim4VRWC's~
He is insinuating rape by bringing in the alleged "child pornography" depicting rape scenes.
To: ~Kim4VRWC's~
Actually, I wasn't speaking for Danielle. I was speaking
for myself.
Not all kids are all that crazy about their parents, either.
To: ~Kim4VRWC's~
BTW, how do you bookmark individual posts for future reference? I know how to do a thread, but not a particular comment.
To: ~Kim4VRWC's~
If Dusek is so convinced that he raped her on the bed in the RV, banging her head against the headboard, where is the hair on the headboard?
Where are the fibers from the pajamas that he ripped off of her in order to rape her?
Where are the fingerprints on the flat surface of the nightstand next to the bed as she was struggling to get off the bed and get away?
Where are the other bodily fluids that would be produced out of fear, and from screaming and crying?
Where is all the blood and semen?
404
posted on
08/14/2002 2:05:48 PM PDT
by
Jaded
To: alisasny
First, I did not call my statement inane. I called your statement inane.
Secondly, I find it easy to "sum up" someone's character, when that someone does NOT back up their assertions with facts.
Thirdly, his opinion(s) seem based on media spin and polls regarding which way the wind is blowing with regard to this trial (since he had NO FACTUAL BASIS FOR HIS OPINION).
Finally, I could not care less what you think of me. You appear to be a "follower" of the congressman, that's fine for you, however I DO NOT rely on other people to speak for me.
BYE
405
posted on
08/14/2002 2:07:09 PM PDT
by
demsux
To: Jaded
To: ~Kim4VRWC's~
You're joking, right?
407
posted on
08/14/2002 2:09:35 PM PDT
by
Jaded
To: JudyB1938
LOL! no way could it have a different meaning for each of us! You just throw those one liners in, catch me off guard.. I bout choked on my pretzel! :) I think feldman had dozens of posts and threads emailed to him on a regular basis... As far as why he didn't provide a stronger defense--such as with the MH..my guess is because he simply could not find anyone to show that kids played in there. Let it be known that I'm SURE the jury hasn't missed his inability to find a witness or two to come forward about it.
To: connectthedots
In all fairness to Congressman Billybob, he is a very busy man and likely has not followed the case nearly as closely as many who post on these threads.FWIW, I took Billybob to task on only one issue during my 4 years on FR. I researched an issue pretty well and was convinced he was wrong. He turned out to be right.
This doesn't mean I would automatically agree with him in the future but I would sure take a second and third look at my posistion.
What is fascinating to me is that someone whom you respect and believe to be bright you conclude without any evidence what-so-ever that he must be ignorant of the facts.
Wow.
To: ican'tbelieveit; ~Kim4VRWC's~
He is insinuating rape by bringing in the alleged "child pornography" depicting rape scenes. I think KIM may have missed this during dUSEK's closing statements.
Dusek didn't just insinuate rape. He described to the jury a scene where Danielle is lying on the bed in the MH, reaching for the cabinet moulding, and DW is lying on top of her, RAPING HER, and her head is banging the cabinets. BANG,BANG,BANG (this is Dusek, rapping his fist on the railing of the jury box).
DUSEK also told the JURY things like it doesn't matter HOW/WHERE/WHEN/WHY, it doesn't matter if there is no proof or evidence, THEY MUST FIND DW guilty JUST BECAUSE "WE KNOW HE DID IT".
To: JudyB1938
Ditto, Judy. Certainly gave me cause for pause.
To: ~Kim4VRWC's~
To: All
Read reply #4 on this thread, by spetznaz:
FBI Shows Hatfill's Photo
Not related to DW's trial but shows how things get manipulated, in this case by the FBI, in concert with the media.
Just another case where someone needs "results".
To: JudyB1938
This is the link to your post...just click the number on whichever posts you want to.
403posted on 8/14/02 4:05 PM Central by JudyB1938
Click it, then bookmark it. You can change the name of the title to say "fiber testimony from Jennifer shen"...
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/732802/posts?page=403#403
To: ~Kim4VRWC's~
Let it be known that I'm SURE the jury hasn't missed his inability to find a witness or two to come forward about it. Which witness was produced that showed DW entering the VD home?
Which witness was produced that showed him leaving their home?
Which witness was produced that showed him transfering her to the MH?
Which witness was produced that showed him dumping her body?
etc.,etc.,etc.
415
posted on
08/14/2002 2:13:42 PM PDT
by
Rheo
To: UCANSEE2; ican'tbelieveit
Yes I did miss it.. that erases that..
To: VRWC_minion
The evidence that he was ignorant of the facts was contained within his very own posts.
To: UCANSEE2
The prosecution's whole case hinges on the idea that Westerfield took Danielle to rape her. If that wasn't the basis, why else would he have a reason to take her, and then kill her? So yes, the prosecutions whole case has been based on INSINUATION of RAPE.
To: Rheo
knock knock
To: ~Kim4VRWC's~
You almost choked on your pretzel? Are you George Bush? J/K about you, but I really do think Demon has come on these threads as a disruptor.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 381-400, 401-420, 421-440 ... 981-991 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson