Skip to comments.
Silence on part of defendant may be hard to ignore
San Diego Union Tribune ^
| 8/4/02
| Alex Roth
Posted on 08/05/2002 6:54:33 AM PDT by Jaded
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-62 next last
And they say silence is golden....He shouldn't have talked before.
1
posted on
08/05/2002 6:54:33 AM PDT
by
Jaded
To: MagnoliaMS; I. Ben Hurt; UCANSEE2; FresnoDA; Mrs.Liberty; demsux; MizSterious; skipjackcity; ...
Ping }}}}
2
posted on
08/05/2002 7:05:43 AM PDT
by
Jaded
To: Jaded
Thanks for the ping, Jaded. Is the trial on for today, or not? I've forgotten.
To: MagnoliaMS
Nope, no court today, so we can get some work done. Feldman's next witness won't be available until Tuesday. There are rumors that it's a Forensic Big Gun.
4
posted on
08/05/2002 7:17:02 AM PDT
by
Jaded
To: Jaded
Well, shucks! Guess I might as well get up from the computer and see if I can get caught up on some housework before tomorrow!
To: MagnoliaMS
Is the trial on for today, or not? I've forgotten. No witnesses today.
They'll finalize jury instruction.
If Feldman's forensic anthropologist is going to testify, Feldman will turn over his report to the prosecution.
To: Jaded; FresnoDA; gigi; All
You guys just HAVE to suck it up and watch Nancy Graceless this morning.
She started out the program with Feldman asking the Judge for the Jury to be sequestered..."pointing the FINGER DIRECTLY AT ME!!"...more to come.
Oh Nancy, you are sooo predictable.
sw
7
posted on
08/05/2002 8:02:03 AM PDT
by
spectre
To: All
They should be back in the courtroom today to decide things, such as the porn charges, and their last witness.
Still waiting for Nancy "kimmiegrace" to speak about Feldman charging CTV with being "less than objectiionable toward DW".
Nan did mention she is waiting for the Jury to bring in their verdict to serve JUSTICE for Danielle.
Wonder what she means by that?
sw
8
posted on
08/05/2002 8:07:51 AM PDT
by
spectre
To: spectre
cute.....
To: spectre
Nancy Grace and Lisa Bloom are just more than I can stand. Nancy sneers and snarls, and Lisa smirks, all between their exaggerations and outright lies. All that sneering, snarling and smirking just turns my stomach.
To: MagnoliaMS; ~Kim4VRWC's~
I know you can't stand her, Magnolia...but remember the number one rule "know your enemy"..
Rodger Cossack said that over 31% of those polled on CTV think that DW is not guilty, and said that is quite a hefty figure against the ususal "prosecution" case. Interesting.
Kimmiegrace, here we go...she's talking about the sequestration. "Buckle your seat belts, buddie"..
"As flatered as I am, that even a "comment" I have made, could even sway the outcome of this trial"..."Is it enough to boil over into a sequestration order?".
Now, she and her guest are claiming they have NOT been one-sided!!!
BAWHAHAHAHAH!!!
Of course you don't want them to be sequestered, Nancy...more time to spill your venom against Westerfield, you hypocritical pig, you!
sw
11
posted on
08/05/2002 8:23:03 AM PDT
by
spectre
To: spectre
I hadn't read about that poll.....Now that IS interesting!
To: Jaded
Happy Monday to you Jaded and thanks for the ping.
13
posted on
08/05/2002 8:36:01 AM PDT
by
BARLF
To: MagnoliaMS
What is interesting, is that was a CTV poll they did in San Diego.
Considering they are biased against DW, this is a significant number. Could signal a hung Jury if the not-guilty Juror's have a stubborn streak!
sw
14
posted on
08/05/2002 8:40:26 AM PDT
by
spectre
To: spectre
You know what is funny...I can't decide which is worse, those people who are saying DW's collection of child porn isn't bad, or grace defending clinton....
To: UCANSEE2; Mrs.Liberty; demsux; Jaded; skipjackcity; BARLF; Valpal1; FriarTom; DoughtyOne; Amore; ...
Thanks for the ping jaded.....
To: ~Kim4VRWC's~
How about Grace defending Clinton and saying DW's porn is bad..?
Focus on that..she's one messed up personality.
sw
17
posted on
08/05/2002 8:59:09 AM PDT
by
spectre
To: spectre
18
posted on
08/05/2002 9:01:42 AM PDT
by
FresnoDA
To: spectre
Spec, child porn is as disgusting as defending clinton. It's really upsetting when people get "paid" to do both too..
To: ~Kim4VRWC's~
You still don't get it, Kim. You never will. You are buying into the trumped up motive, that cuz he had disqusting child porn in his CD files, that he raped and killed Danielle.
Do not think for one second, as you have tried to imply, that some of us trial watchers are making light of the child porn. For the millionth time..we deploy child porn. How many times do we have to print it out..how many, Kim?
If YOU think that DW should be put to death, because of it...and that would be the State's case against him, the child porn..then it is between you and your conscience.
Not ONE Forensic psychiatrist would dare testify that it was a Motive, or an indicator. NOT ONE.
That's all I'm going to say, without losing it, Kim.
sw
20
posted on
08/05/2002 9:37:39 AM PDT
by
spectre
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-62 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson