Skip to comments.
Judge Mudd Says Sequestering Of Jury Possible: Van Dam case has jurors facing more Mad-Dawgging!!
Union Trib ^
| July 30, 3002
| Alex Roth
Posted on 07/30/2002 7:13:26 AM PDT by FresnoDA
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 921-940, 941-960, 961-980 ... 1,021-1,023 next last
To: hoosiermama
I don't think it will matter, sounds like he's going to strike the entire testimony of whoever it was.
To: Karson
Here is what I think, which isn't worth much. Feldman has his own fiber expert and Dusek knows it. Feldman entered the pics of orange clad people knowing Dusek would bring back Susan to refute fiber match. Now, Feldman can answer on sur rebuttal. And maybe he has evidence of BVD wearing orange sweater at Dad's and Dusek knows this too. So, he tries to impeach LePage. Probably wishful thinking on my part. But I do think those orange fibers came from an orange, fuzzy sweater.
942
posted on
07/30/2002 9:28:53 PM PDT
by
Jrabbit
To: hoosiermama
You know, John, it just occurred to me that maybe we didn't see Barb and some of the other witnesses, because they waiting for "the next trial" after DW acquittal......HHHhhhmmmm. Naw to far out!
To: hoosiermama
Remember how many times Feldman asked Brenda if Bill Libby ever spent the night?
To: hoosiermama
That would be so neat.
To: Jrabbit
Sounds good to me! Bugz
To: Jrabbit
Whoever it is, Mudd already knows they're lying. I wonder if they were called on the carpet and admitted it offcamera?
To: John Jamieson
My thought on Libby spending the night. He got up and wnet home at 4:00 AM so he didn't actually spend the entire night there.......It's and IS thing!
To: hoosiermama
LOL! Where is bs? I was going to use my new name tonite. Rats! or should I say dad nab it?!
949
posted on
07/30/2002 9:35:23 PM PDT
by
Jrabbit
To: hoosiermama
I tell you it's the Bren. The LE used her testimony to get the warrents. Not factual...You don't think the LE are going down for it. They'll use BVD as their scapegoat.
Someone listed once all the things she had testified to or were in other documents that contradicted either her own or someone elses' testimony. WIsh I'd kept that post. Poor BVD!
To: Jrabbit
Must have had air ran to run.
To: hoosiermama
What if its a cop??? Feldman kept calling one of them back.
To: hoosiermama
What is the meaning of a shield?
To: John Jamieson
OOOooooo that would be juicy! WHich one?
Can't wait to hear the D fiber person!!!!
To: hoosiermama
How about the one that found all that BLOOD and DNA?
To: calawah98
It has to do with protection for journalists. The Shield Law. I think this is correct.
956
posted on
07/30/2002 9:44:06 PM PDT
by
Karson
To: John Jamieson
Good choice! LOL
To: hoosiermama
This is out of left field, but I will forever wonder why Feldman asked about the poison oak several times, if he never ties it in.
He HAD to have reason to mention it and the reactions from it concerning at least two people.
To: Karson
Must be, because Feldman mentioned it in connection with River and the reporter that laid the ground work for the tapes.
To: hoosiermama
Didn't someone say the penalty for falsifing evidence in a death penalty case was death?
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 921-940, 941-960, 961-980 ... 1,021-1,023 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson