Skip to comments.
Anybody else disgusted at the slaughter of emulsions by Kodak?
Me
| 3/11/02
| Me
Posted on 03/11/2002 12:24:59 PM PST by Don Joe
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-97 next last
Argh, argh, argh!
1
posted on
03/11/2002 12:24:59 PM PST
by
Don Joe
To: Don Joe, sir gawain
uh.....yeah.....sure
To: Don Joe
No sweat, partner. . .
Good Bye Kodak -- Hello Fuji, Konica, ect.
3
posted on
03/11/2002 12:52:36 PM PST
by
Crowcreek
To: Don Joe
Is there an actual piece of news you are ranting about?
4
posted on
03/11/2002 1:16:21 PM PST
by
mlo
To: Don Joe
Pictures, please.
To: Don Joe
Kodak is a buggywhip industry. So is Xerox.
Thusly, I left Rochester.
6
posted on
03/11/2002 1:22:04 PM PST
by
Lazamataz
To: Don Joe
Well, if anyone was still questioning whether or not to short Kodak stock, they have their answer now. This company is barreling towards Chapter 11 faster than Bill Clinton towards a pair of 36Ds.
7
posted on
03/11/2002 1:22:25 PM PST
by
Timesink
To: Don Joe
Sob...those poor little emulsions...silver halide running in the gutters...the horror...the horror....
To: Don Joe

(Note to those reading this chart from THE FUTURE!: This chart is dynamically generated every time this page loads, using data up to and including the current day. What we're seeing on March 11 isn't what you're seeing in 2025. Of course, knowing Yahoo, they'll change the URL for their stock charts a week after I post this anyway, and all you'll see is a big empty rectangle. FR really needs to start letting people load graphics onto the FR servers ... not just that stupid "Caption This Image" section, but for anything.)
9
posted on
03/11/2002 1:27:01 PM PST
by
Timesink
To: mlo
This is General Interest. Home of all things amusing, bewildering, cheese-infested, and vanity-esque. It's a nod to the whiners on the regular side who couldn't figure out how to NOT click on a thread they thought they may have no interest in.
To: Bella_Bru
Does this mean we can have a General Interest moderator who will slap around whiners and delete newsworthy posts??
To: freedomlover
I hope so!
To: Crowcreek
"Good Bye Kodak -- Hello Fuji, Konica, ect." The thing is, there's nothing remotely comparable to the emulsions they killed. They were really head and shoulders above the crowd.
K25 and RG25 were grainless razor-sharp emulsions. You could make huge prints and have the quality rival 4x5 quality. Literally!
What happened as best as I can tell is that the beancounters took over and said gee, we're not making our target revenues from those lines, so dump 'em. That would be like Chevrolet dropping the Corvette, or Dodge dropping the Viper.
They killed their flagship products, they cut their pro lines off at the knees, and they're trying to go toe-to-toe with the "cost-cutter" off-brand stuff for the point-and-shoot crowd. Instead of playing up the quality of those legendary emulsions, they pared down their consumer lines, rebadged 'em with stupid teenybopper names like "Max Zoom!" and put bright shiny colors (doubtless tested on lab monkeys) on the boxes.
My freezer is full, I'm still trying to round up some 120 RG25 (and some more 35mm if I can) at reasonable prices. They're all way outdated, but I found a roll that had been bouncing around in two attics over ten years and ran it through my old Retina 2a for giggles, and it came back looking like it was fresh off the shelf. The slow films have staggering keeping qualities. (Films age due to heat and cosmic rays, and the faster the emulsion, the more susceptible it is to the latter.)
I could keep on ranting (and probably will later on :)) but I need to sit back and de-aggravate my blood pressure now... Ugh!
13
posted on
03/11/2002 1:49:14 PM PST
by
Don Joe
To: Lazamataz
"Kodak is a buggywhip industry." They can have my Kodachrome when they pry it from my...
14
posted on
03/11/2002 1:51:54 PM PST
by
Don Joe
To: Bella_Bru
Now I have to keep two windows open. One for the serious stuff and one for the fun stuff.
To: CharacterCounts
Be careful, that comments was a little too ... serious. :)
To: Don Joe
And leave my sliderule alone too!
17
posted on
03/11/2002 2:17:43 PM PST
by
falfa
To: Don Joe
Don Joe, where did you read/hear about this, anyway? I'd like to read more myself, but I'm having trouble finding any news stories about it.
18
posted on
03/11/2002 2:18:07 PM PST
by
Timesink
To: Timesink
"...I'm having trouble finding news stories about it."
If you insist on talking about 'news', I'll press the 'Abuse' button.
This forum is for 'un-news', get it??
To: headsonpikes
What about news about Britney Spears's breasts? Bet you wouldn't hit the abuse button on THAT!

Hiiii, headsonpikes. *blowing kiss!*
20
posted on
03/11/2002 2:47:49 PM PST
by
Timesink
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-97 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson