Posted on 11/18/2025 10:43:10 AM PST by SeekAndFind
Dear FRiends,
We need your continuing support to keep FR funded. Your donations are our sole source of funding. No sugar daddies, no advertisers, no paid memberships, no commercial sales, no gimmicks, no tax subsidies. No spam, no pop-ups, no ad trackers.
If you enjoy using FR and agree it's a worthwhile endeavor, please consider making a contribution today:
Click here: to donate by Credit Card
Or here: to donate by PayPal
Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794
Thank you very much and God bless you,
Jim
Your's is a very USA-centric view of "diversity."
Singapore does indeed have the racial breakdown you state. BUT its schooling (the topic here) is very specifically HOMOGENOUS, to ensure racial harmony and meritocracy.
All students are Singapore-born (except for a very small amount of foreign expats, usually at international schools). They are not cycling through thousands of illegal migrants from across the world.
from 1987 onward, the Singapore Govt mandated that core curricula are taught in English only. They have standardized schedules, standardized tests, standardized textbooks etc. - to ensure Singapore's famous meritocracy is preserved. By high school, students may choose one course for mother tongue instruction (much like US students can study Spanish, French, German) purely out of interest.
Singapore has licensed six madrassas for Muslim students (a very small percentage of students) who want extra religious study, but their core curriculum is the same as everyone else and is taught in English. The government ensures there is no specific racial or ethnic focus in these schools - although the majority tend to be Indian/Malay/Arab students. Even the madrassas are such that a Chinese student could enter and feel they belong there.
Starting in the early 1990s, Singapore Government created strict controls over Islamic studies, and who teaches it for thes specialized schools.
So again, unlike US schools in different states and locales, Singapore schools are extremely homogenous in their content, learning and social/civic education.
Yes, this is 100% true. NO ONE shows up in China and says "I want to do a large and comprehensive survey of your education system and students, OK?" Any such surveys are conducted 100% on Chinese Government terms, with outcomes they plan in advance.
Once the CCP, after a lot of political consideration and internal debate, decides to participate in such an international survey, they will select who participates. They will certainly choose the best areas and best schools of a city like Shanghai or Beijing. Nothing is left to chance.
And groups like the UN or Intl NGOs go along with it, because 1) they are stupid, 2) have political groupthink, and 3) their job is to go along with any expected results.
Sure, Yahoo News. People educated under the Department of Education may believe you. But nobody else. Say, Yahoo, where did you get your education? Maybe that is part of your problem, too.
If we were #1 it was because the rest of the world was either destroyed or underdeveloped. European schools were much more rigorous than ours. Over the last 40 years or so, they’ve gotten slacker, as have ours.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.