Posted on 10/08/2025 1:04:56 PM PDT by MtnClimber
And love is not fornication.
You seem to agree with me that Franco and his allies in Spain were right wing and allied with traditional conservative factions in Spain. That being the case, why would Mussolini and Hitler back Franco if (according to you and the author of this article) Hitler and Mussolinu were allegedly "left wing"?
Similarly, in 1933 the Nazis had a plurality but not a majority in the Reichstag. The only way Hitler could become chancellor was to make a coalition. The coalition he made was with conservatives, not with communists or Democratic-socialists. Similarly, conservatives like Hindenburg (along with industrialists and bankers, at least those who weren't Jewish) much preferred the Nazis to Democratic socialists. Again, that would make no sense if Nazis were "left wing". The same thing applies to the alliances and coalitions that Italian Fascists made early on.
By definition, the Right defended traditional institutions (Monarchy, aristocracy, and Church) while the Left undermined them. That's basically the dictionary definition of Left and Right. Your definition of "Left Wing" seems to be "anything I don't like" and Right wing as "anything I like".
Similarly, anyone who thinks that Francisco Franco was a Leftist is terribly confused. Both his supporters (including most US conservatives at the time) and his enemies (leftists) correctly recognized him as the defender of traditional institutions and private property rights in Spain against various left wing factions.
“Fascism is the stage reached after communism has proved an illusion”
- Friedrich August Hayek
In 1920s and 1930s Europe, Fascists were nationalists (as opposed to internationalists); this made them seem the lesser of two evils to those you label as "conservatives". Monarchists and industrialists thought (wrongly) that they had a chance of controlling the likes of Mussolini and Hitler.
You seem to have fallen for the communist propaganda canard that fascism is the diametrical opposite of communism. It is not. It is barely distinguishable from communism. LIBERTY is the diametrical opposite of communism.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.