Posted on 09/05/2025 8:08:58 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
You assert claims without evidence or proof.
That is despicable—particularly when it can affect the health of children.
The stakes are high.
What, specifically, did I say that is not supported by any evidence or proof?
I very clearly dissected the narrative that doctors make more from vaccinating children than they do from treating them. I even provided links showing how costly some infectious disease treatments are. The thing about these analyses is that anyone can do them, the information is out there. What else do I need to provide? The morbidity and mortality statistics for unvaccinated children who are exposed to a disease they should have been vaccinated with? A graph showing the fall of childhood mortality over time, corresponding to the increased availability of vaccines?
I really wonder why you are pushing the antivax narrative. Are you misinformed, or are you doing this deliberately to hurt children?
The data is generated by Big Pharma and those who are directly or indirectly funded by them.
They have spent billions brainwashing those who can be brainwashed.
Apparently their efforts have been successful with you.
Break the chains and join the real human race.
It appears you do not understand how the FDA oversees “big pharma.”
The FDA is looking for any reason to stop “big pharma” in its tracks. It is super difficult for anyone involved in pharmaceutical development to convince the FDA to accept anything.
I worked in an institution that was trying to push a prototype drug towards human trials. As part of our testing of the drug, it was given to rabbits. One of the rabbits died. The FDA stopped our testing right there, and required us to demonstrate that the reason the rabbit died would not cause harm to humans. This put our research on that drug back by about six months while we determined why the rabbit died and showed the FDA that the rabbit died due to a quirk in rabbit physiology that does not exist in human physiology..
The way I look at it, if the FDA cares so much about a rabbit, they are certainly not going to let something pass if there is even a slight possibility it will harm humans.
Bribe politicians and your drug gets approved.
Easy peasy.
No bribes no approval.
Where do you even find such claims?
Politicians have nothing to do with drug approvals.
I highly suggest you do some research into how drugs are approved. And by "research" I mean to actually read material such as the laws regarding drug testing and approval.
A team of CDER physicians, statisticians, chemists, pharmacologists, and other scientists reviews the company's data and proposed labeling. If this independent and unbiased review establishes that a drug's health benefits outweigh its known risks, the drug is approved for sale. You might notice that the team reviewing the drugs does not have a single politician. They are all scientists who have a LOT more education and knowledge than any politician.
Scientists are like back alley whores on a Friday night.
If you pay the freight they are yours for a night.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.