Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Q ~ Trust Trump's Plan ~ 09/01/2025 Vol.511, Q Day 2866
Qalerts.app ^ | 09/01/2025 | FReeQs, FReepers, LurQers and Vanity

Posted on 08/31/2025 9:08:15 PM PDT by ransomnote

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 621-627 next last
To: ransomnote
I live in the Philippines and today got a routine annual letter from social security to verify my address etc.

Butt when I sent the reply back in the return envelope I was told they are not allowing anything to be sent to the US because of tariffs. Tariffs are for small packages that China sends all over via other countries to cheat tariffs.

Probably a misunderstanding but you see how the left and the stupid are framing tariffs overseas.

41 posted on 09/01/2025 2:08:18 AM PDT by LadyDoc (liberals only love politically correct poor people)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sobieski at Kahlenberg Mtn.

Just too good, the start of a new mega thousand thread.Huge accomplishment week after week, anyone seeking truthful news and opinion need only go here. Thanks to both of you for doing what you do.


42 posted on 09/01/2025 2:23:45 AM PDT by rodguy911 (Home of the Free Because of the Brave!! ITS ALL A CONSPIRACY:UNTIL ITS NOT!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote

in for show. tthanks ransomnote for being our guide.


43 posted on 09/01/2025 3:11:08 AM PDT by teeman8r (Armageddon won't be pretty, but it's not like it's the end of the world or something )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote

In before fiddy!

Thanks MQD!


44 posted on 09/01/2025 3:32:33 AM PDT by HombreSecreto (The life of a repo man is always intense)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote

45 posted on 09/01/2025 3:57:24 AM PDT by USMC79to83
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote
In on catatonic Joe’s number.

Someobes gotta do it🫩

46 posted on 09/01/2025 3:59:25 AM PDT by thingumbob (INTUITION - is your brain trying to tell you what your mind hasn’t pieced together yet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thingumbob

In early!

-SB


47 posted on 09/01/2025 4:05:56 AM PDT by Snowybear (Do or do not, there is no try.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Snowybear

Hey Hey a new thread. Happy Labor Day everyone.


48 posted on 09/01/2025 4:08:45 AM PDT by MomwithHope (Forever grateful to all our patriots, past, present and future.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote

Thanks for the new thread!


49 posted on 09/01/2025 4:27:06 AM PDT by NCjim (Do not argue with an idiot. He will drag you down to his level and beat you with experience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote

Here at less than my age. Outstanding!


50 posted on 09/01/2025 4:33:13 AM PDT by AFB-XYZ (( We have two options: 1. Stand up, or 2. Bend over))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote; All
Here's the bottom line from Italy a study with 300k taking part.

Eventually these studies will figure out it's not just cancers but many other issues from the shots. They include heart,lungs,most organs and many other issues. All happen from the shots. The more you have had the worse it gets.

That's my opinion from my research.

...............................

Here's the latest from the source:

https://www.thefocalpoints.com/p/breaking-first-population-wide-study?utm_source=post-email-title&publication_id=1119676&post_id=172353455&utm_campaign=email-post-title&isFreemail=true&r=2492wq&triedRedirect=true&utm_medium=email

BREAKING:

First Population-Wide Study Finds COVID-19 "Vaccines" Increase Risk of Multiple Cancers

Official government data from nearly 300,000 people tracked for 30 months show mRNA shots significantly increase the risk of overall cancer, breast cancer, bladder cancer, and colorectal cancer.

Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

Aug 30, 2025

by Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

A groundbreaking new peer-reviewed study has just been published in EXCLI Journal. For the first time, researchers formally analyzed the long-term relationship between COVID-19 vaccination and cancer hospitalizations in a population-wide cohort of nearly 300,000 residents of Pescara province, Italy.

The study followed every resident aged ≥11 years for 30 months (June 2021 through December 2023) using official National Health Service data. The main vaccines administered were Pfizer-BioNTech (Comirnaty) and Moderna (Spikevax) mRNA shots, with smaller proportions receiving AstraZeneca (Vaxzevria) and Janssen (Johnson & Johnson) viral vector vaccines.

Importantly, the statistical models were adjusted for age, sex, comorbidities (diabetes, hypertension, cardiovascular disease, COPD, kidney disease), prior cancer, and prior SARS-CoV-2 infection — ensuring that infection status was explicitly taken into account. This makes it the longest and most comprehensive follow-up to date on cancer outcomes after COVID-19 vaccination.

The results are deeply concerning: while the study shows the expected biases that make vaccines look like they reduce overall death rates, it also uncovers the first statistically significant evidence of increased cancer risk following COVID-19 vaccination.

THE FIRST FORMAL SIGNAL: INCREASED CANCER RISK

Despite strong “healthy vaccinee bias” (explained below), the study still found multiple increases in cancer hospitalizations among vaccinated individuals.

Overall cancer risk:

+23% increased risk after ≥1 dose (HR 1.23, 95% CI 1.11–1.37) (statistically significant)

+9% increased risk after ≥3 doses (HR 1.09, 95% CI 1.02–1.16) (statistically significant)

BY CANCER SITE (Hazard Ratios Converted to % Increased Risk)

Breast cancer

+54% with ≥1 dose (HR 1.54, 95% CI 1.10–2.16) (statistically significant)

+36% with ≥3 doses (HR 1.36, 95% CI 1.08–1.72) (statistically significant)

Bladder cancer

+62% with ≥1 dose (HR 1.62, 95% CI 1.07–2.45) (statistically significant)

+43% with ≥3 doses (HR 1.43, 95% CI 1.08–1.88) (statistically significant)

Colon-rectum cancer

+35% with ≥1 dose (HR 1.35, 95% CI 1.01–1.80) (statistically significant)

+14% with ≥3 doses (HR 1.14, 95% CI 0.96–1.36) (not statistically significant)

Hematological cancers (leukemia/lymphoma)

+31% with ≥1 dose (HR 1.31, 95% CI 0.96–1.79) (not statistically significant)

+7% with ≥3 doses (HR 1.07, 95% CI 0.89–1.29) (not statistically significant)

Uterine cancer

+77% with ≥1 dose (HR 1.77, 95% CI 0.76–4.13) (not statistically significant)

+20% with ≥3 doses (HR 1.20, 95% CI 0.73–1.96) (not statistically significant)

Ovarian cancer

+71% with ≥1 dose (HR 1.71, 95% CI 0.60–4.82) (not statistically significant)

+86% with ≥3 doses (HR 1.86, 95% CI 0.68–5.12) (not statistically significant)

Thyroid cancer

+58% with ≥1 dose (HR 1.58, 95% CI 0.84–2.99) (not statistically significant)

-3% with ≥3 doses (HR 0.97, 95% CI 0.67–1.45) (not statistically significant)

Prostate cancer

+1% with ≥1 dose (HR 1.01, 95% CI 0.68–1.49) (not statistically significant)

-3% with ≥3 doses (HR 0.97, 95% CI 0.76–1.23) (not statistically significant)

Lung cancer

-10% with ≥1 dose (HR 0.90, 95% CI 0.68–1.18) (not statistically significant)

-7% with ≥3 doses (HR 0.93, 95% CI 0.79–1.11) (not statistically significant)

There is more but an accompanying study is significant as well.

It's below:'


51 posted on 09/01/2025 4:43:50 AM PDT by rodguy911 (Home of the Free Because of the Brave!! ITS ALL A CONSPIRACY:UNTIL ITS NOT!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote

ThankQ Ransomnote!

Wow, Labor Day is here. Where did the summer go?

I do have to say that Fall is a beautiful time of year. It is especially wonderful this year while we are also watching the evil opposition come apart before our eyes.


52 posted on 09/01/2025 5:01:06 AM PDT by Kalam (The Qonjurer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote; bitt

Hoppin in

Thanx for the new thread


53 posted on 09/01/2025 5:09:54 AM PDT by thinden (Buckle Up!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote

Another shiny new thread! Thank you!


54 posted on 09/01/2025 5:31:29 AM PDT by nclaurel (The man with the pencil always wins. Paper ballots counted in full view now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote
You are always faithful, rn! Thanks for the new thread!

Where are all these posters when I am posting around midnight and there are no responses to anything? 🤔❓

55 posted on 09/01/2025 5:36:56 AM PDT by Bob Ireland (The Democrap Party is the enemy of freedom.They use all the seductions and deceits of the Bolshevics)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: datricker

Did you come just to criticize because we aren’t interested in your opinion.


56 posted on 09/01/2025 5:38:19 AM PDT by nclaurel (The man with the pencil always wins. Paper ballots counted in full view now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

Comment #57 Removed by Moderator

To: ransomnote; All

President Trump post on Truth Social concerning Operation Warpspeed and drug companies showing the public the same data they showed him.

It is very important that the Drug Companies justify the success of their various Covid Drugs. Many people think they are a miracle that saved Millions of lives. Others disagree! With CDC being ripped apart over this question, I want the answer, and I want it NOW. I have been shown information from Pfizer, and others, that is extraordinary, but they never seem to show those results to the public. Why not??? They go off to the next “hunt” and let everyone rip themselves apart, including Bobby Kennedy Jr. and CDC, trying to figure out the success or failure of the Drug Companies Covid work. They show me GREAT numbers and results, but they don’t seem to be showing them to many others. I want them to show them NOW, to CDC and the public, and clear up this MESS, one way or the other!!! I hope OPERATION WARP SPEED was as “BRILLIANT” as many say it was. If not, we all want to know about it, and why??? Thank you for your attention to this very important matter! President DJT https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/115128985245605660


58 posted on 09/01/2025 5:55:13 AM PDT by Watchdog85
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: LonePalm

Love your posts, LP!

59 posted on 09/01/2025 6:00:04 AM PDT by Oratam ("I have INFO on everyone!" --@realDonaldTrump 1/16/2023)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: All

In!

🦅💥🦅💥🦅💥🦅


60 posted on 09/01/2025 6:16:51 AM PDT by aMorePerfectUnion (🦅 MAGADONIAN ⚔️ LIFE )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 621-627 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson