And you seem unduly terrorized by dust bunnies.
ransomnote: 'Rita', that's your lammest response to date.
You lead with such uncalled for, over-the-top rage against just about anyone’s expression that doesn’t perpetuate positively Manic delight in every jot and tittle of current events, concerns for our president, and with no mercy for others who want to express concerns or other common observations happening right before your upright nose, if you ever deign to expose your flaps that is, to anything outside of your own tyrannical hunt for prey to atrack.
ransomnote: A smart person whom I respect said that you are actually male and I assumed I had overlooked that in your writing and adopted that view. But then you sometimes write hyperbolic text like a teenage girl who signs her name with either lightening bolts or hearts, based on her polarized emotions.
You sound like Eva Peron, a solid loon.
ransomnote: I'd never heard anyone say that someone sounds like Eva Person; I have no idea what you are trying to say, so I looked it up. AI said she spoke with a distinctive manner: "Eva Perón, also known as Evita, was a prominent political figure and a powerful orator. Her voice and manner of speaking were often described as commanding and charismatic." Okay so it looks like AI doesn't understand you either.
Pronouncing charges and judgements against freepers loyal to the president, who defend him as well as you do, here and everywhere, who do not, each and all, want to see him switching horses on his declarations.
ransomnote: I've spoken to you repeatedly about your inistence on "pronouncing charges and judgements against FReepers, of the FReeQ persuasion, loyal to the president, who defend him better than you do, here and everywhere." Remember your endorsement of an article which said we were the worst generation? Yes, I think you posted it the same day Trump praised us. You've been judging and ridiculing us for years.
I don't know anyone who enjoys the information war side of Presidential comms, but most trust the President and those who are worried manage to do so without working to erode others' support for him.
'Rita', I see you've been working on one of your numerous weaknesses; you're saying 'each and all' when you speak for everyone when you normally use the royal 'we ' to speak for everyone.
It is not okay. It can be seen as “chameleon”, both here and abroad. You can ignore it. I speak against it. If I am wrong there will be no repercussions to concern your Selfness.
ransomnote: You 'speak against it' by insulting the President and Commander in Chief's integrity, sanity and intellect when he is leading us to victory in a time of war. I responded because, "It is not okay." You are attacking our General from behind in a time of war, but you become angry and find it intolerable when it's my turn to 'speak against it.'
You are still pretending there is no information war, therefore you assure me none of your insults will have repercussions which impact me. You've been on the wrong, losing side of this information war for years.
I would say your vicious language is a near clinical example for what far right tyrants can sound like.
ransomnote: You're really trying to act as if you didn't just question Trump's integrity, cognitive functioning and competence. You're acting as if you didn't term his strategic manuevering as 'bizarre.' You are deflecting at high rpm's as if the 'real problem' here is that I am a 'far right tyrant'.
I can go to Imgur.com, TheHill.com; Politico.com; Cnn.com etc. right now and find posts like yours sneering about Trump's fitness to lead our country.
You sound no different than the Disinformation hunter gal put in short-lived control to shut down Covid. Even democrats shut down her bash of constitutional speech, vigorous though it was.
ransomnote: I have no idea what you are talking about. This converation we're having is not about bashing constitutional speech.
You made sneering reference to our Commander in Chief and I didn't like it. I pointed out my reasons. You proceeded to meltdown, leading with a comment suggesting I was 'terrorized by dust bunnies.'
Bullies often diminish the true intention of their insults by saying, 'it was nothing' or asking 'can't you take a joke?' You're here likening insulting the President's fitness to lead to 'dust bunnies' that 'terrorize' me.
Q on the other hand, drew us to historical accounts of events and influences, and stoked our own observations along the way, of past outcomes and a future Plan.
Q did not try to appear as GOD.
ransomnote: More deflection from you. I've never heard people imply we're treating Q like (a) god except forum trolls. They knew many of us are Christian and wished to insult us by sneering that we were heretics. Note Q never derided Trump's judgement as bizarre nor did Q portray surprise that Trump depended on his own integrity. Pushing back on your insults is not equivalent to implying Q is god.
Take a note.
ransomnote: Okay, you made me lol a little You just can't be taken seriously. Your words lack force and impact.
You are psyops.
ransomnote: So why do I keep exposing you when you try to lash others on this thread to engage in insurrection? Why do I keep exposing you when you work to demoralize us and drive us off the thread?
Defying all manner of rules for exchange of varying opinion, out of terror, is not patriotism.
ransomnote: Does recognizing this boxed format I use for my replies 'terrorize' you? Do you realize I've addressed you and feel your blood run cold in fear, because it means you're about to be publicly stripped of free speech?
You have no truth to back up your statements so you give no reasoned reply, therefore there's no debate. Having nothing you can say to defend your conduct on this thread, you declare you're being oppressed:
I would say your vicious language is a near clinical example for what far right tyrants can sound like.
You speak of 'dust bunnies' and 'terror' to drag us as far away from your repulsive comments as possible. The real reason we're having this exchange is because you capped your sneering remarks about President Trump's decision-making by impugning his fitness to lead the country:
I don’t know what a sound mind makes of this reign of obviously fluctuating behavior. How to dare depend on one’s own integrity when defending chameleon declarations.
I think there is a name for it, but it is not 3-5G Chess.
325 posted on 8/2/2025, 9:32:45 PM by RitaOK (Viva Christo Rey. For Greater Glory. )
Trump's strategies are hard to understand, but they are working. That's the real problem you're complaining about; Trump's unpredictable strategies are working. This isn't the first time we couldn't understand what he was doing, and it won't be the last. But his Art of War, and that of Q and other patriots, has brought him back into office against impossible odds. It's habbening.
