Posted on 07/20/2025 5:54:42 AM PDT by MtnClimber
Watergate?
Is that the one where the Deputy Director of the FBI created a false narrative, and, operating under a pseudonym (“Deep Throat”) used 2 reporters as scribes to obtain the forced resignation of a President who only 18 months before had received 520 electoral votes and 61% of the popular vote?
THAT Watergate?
“””He was put up there as a candidate who couldn’t be questioned without there being shrieks of racism from the left.”””
Maybe Tulsi Gabbard can reveal who the real puppetmaster is.
To be honest those forty one seats lost always seemed rather a high number. I’d guess there was some skullduggery involved.
“This could get interesting”
This could get bloody.
Realize this, everybody. If you want to get Obama you are going to have to make deals. These deals will include immunity for some very bad actors who belong in prison, AND who are much more likely to be convicted than Obama is.
They need to go after all of them, including 0bama, to show that no one is above the law. The ways they have gone after Trump should leave no doubt that they will not be shown any leniency.
Bkmk
Obama comes from Chicago. The most common phrase in Chicago is:
Don’t get caught doing something corrupt or illegal.
The key word is “caught”, of course. Nobody says “Don’t do it.” The say “Don’t get caught doing it.”
Obama knows the rules of the game.
Tulsi is on Maria’s show right now.... outstanding interview and be sure to catch the rerun later in the day.
“After the meeting, DNI Clapper’s Executive Assistant sent an email to IC [intelligence community] leaders tasking them with creating a new IC assessment “per the President’s request” that details the “tools Moscow used and actions it took to influence the 2016 election.” It went on to say, “ODNI will lead this effort with participation from CIA, FBI, NSA, and DHS.”
Let us pray that Gabbard already possesses recordings and/or sworn statements from others present at the meeting to corroborate that Obama truly made this request, and did so without some figleaf qualification (e.g., “do everything by the book”). I hope also that she keeps the corroborating evidence under wraps until various scoundrels have denied the facts publicly and in sworn interviews.
Without corroboration, Clapper writing, “per the President’s request” in a message to others is hearsay; Obama can deny ever saying it, or imply that Clapper either misunderstood him or is to blame for excessive zeal in his desire to protect the country.
Tulsi Gabbard has some serious courage.
“They need to ‘go after’ all of them”
If you think Obama is going to be convicted without live testimony from a senior official you are crazy.
If you think Clapper, Brennan, or Rice are going to give up Obama without immunity you are crazier.
Well, those posts are useful in a way - to know how the judges who hear these cases are going to be thinking.
What will be interesting is whether this becomes interesting or whether it fails to get legs…yet again.
+1 Right to the point.
Tulsi needs a SS detail.
More to come on this. Tulsi said more info is coming out next week.
BTTT
I always thought 0 would be discarded when they had no more use for him. I didn’t think it would take 10 years and this wasn’t the manner I expected.
But, the manner I expected is still quite possible.
We’re all being gaslighted. Nothing of significance will happen
Where? (just one example)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.