You aren't alone in thinking that. Stay away from your cell phones!
.
Caution: Not what people want to hear.
Posted on 07/09/2025 4:01:31 PM PDT by NoLibZone
Ghislane was convicted of trafficking underage girls to Epstein. And no one else, from what I read.
I believe you are correct.
BTTT
That’s not the black book you’re looking for. You can go about your business. Move along.
My best guess at this point is that Trump has the list and is using it.
Or as I call it - jackassin’.
A. Epstein was an intelligence asset and revealing so would compromise intelligence gathering secrets and national security, and those agencies destroyed the evidence
B. The files were scrubbed and destroyed by the Biden administration Justice Department because high level Democrats, Republicans, and business people were compromised
C. Trump's name was on the list and he ordered Bondi, et al to stop any further work on it.
I have a hard time believing "C" because that would be almost impossible to believe everyone with knowledge of that would fall in line in that sort of cover up.
Not a speed reader.
Yes.
“The trial was Maxwell trafficking to Epstein”
Ah, thank you.
“Wouldn’t just about any Gulfstream G550 have a bed in it, isn’t it a very large, ultra long range distance aircraft?”
Good question. Maybe?
“My mistake, the Lolita Express was actually a different plane, his previous jet, it was a Boeing 727”
Not many of those left. Supposed to be exceptionally good at short runways because the flaps ran the length of the wing. No engines in the way.
A black book or a rolodex or a contact list isn’t necessarily a list of clients or victims. There will be names there who aren’t involved in wrongdoing. That’s not to say that there wasn’t wrongdoing, but “Epstein’s list” in the sense that people are using the phrase wouldn’t be something he left lying around.
You can tell from Kash Patel’s dead eyes that there’s nothing going on behind them. Trusting this chump has been Trump’s biggest mistake.
The girls were decorations and distractions. They were like models at a car show. Lolita Island was simply an isolated and protected meeting place where the wealthy and powerful could meet with each other without any publicity. People who didn’t want the public to know whom they met with or what was discussed.
Did Jeffrey try to hit on the up and coming models who would do just about anything to score in the competitive modeling industry ?? Probably. Did one of the girls lie about her age to get the gig ? Probably.
The important part was that no one revealed WHO met with WHOM and discussed WHAT. That was Jeffrey’s guarantee. After he was arrested, some of the models went to court for alleged ‘sexual abuse’. It was handled as a class action type case and it’s purpose was to provide a ‘kitty’ of money (thanks Prince Charles) that was used to provide each girl who HAD info on who met who and what might have been discussed a piece of the settlement pie. Each one (most important part) signed a non-disclosure agreement in return for almost $1 Million. Not a bad return for just keeping their mouth shut.
If these people (rich and famous/wealthy and powerful world leaders) wanted to have a young female to ravage, they could have one delivered to their door in a flash. Why would they need to go to an island just for illicit or illegal sex ?
They wouldn’t. They didn’t. They went there so they could make plans, make deals, with other world leaders. World leaders that were technically their ‘enemy’.
Epstein Island was just a way that the puppetmasters kept the strings hidden from the masses.
Consider this: IF this was a getaway for illegal and illicit sex with minors, and knowing the proclivities of some of the hoi-polloi, why were all the models GIRLS ????i
You aren't alone in thinking that. Stay away from your cell phones!
.
Caution: Not what people want to hear.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.