Skip to comments.
Email signatures are harming the planet and could cost people their lives — it’s time to stop using them
The Conversation ^
| 3-16-25
| Joshua M. Pearce
Posted on 03/18/2025 9:24:48 AM PDT by dynachrome
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-31 last
To: asinclair
Don’t forget BitCoin mining and data farms. They use massive amounts of power.
21
posted on
03/18/2025 10:33:08 AM PDT
by
Dutch Boy
(The only thing worse than having something taken from you is to have it returned broken. )
To: dynachrome
Like old time telegrams?
Saw sub, sank same
22
posted on
03/18/2025 10:44:22 AM PDT
by
Alas Babylon!
(Repeal the Patriot Act; Abolish the DHS; reform FBI top to bottom!)
To: dynachrome
You can’t give these people an inch. Everything, and I mean everything, can and will be declared impermissible by them if we allow it.
23
posted on
03/18/2025 10:58:31 AM PDT
by
scott7278
(Those who beat their swords into plowshares usually end up plowing for those who kept their swords.)
To: dynachrome
For every email signature, a flower grows.
24
posted on
03/18/2025 11:05:53 AM PDT
by
John Milner
(Marching for Peace is like breathing for food.)
To: dynachrome
What if that 1000 tons of “additional carbon” comes from the manufacture of a life saving drug?
25
posted on
03/18/2025 11:09:35 AM PDT
by
Trinity5
To: dynachrome
This guy is an educated fool or psycho.
26
posted on
03/18/2025 11:11:45 AM PDT
by
Sequoyah101
(Donald John Trump. First man to be Elected to the Presidency THREE times since FDR.)
To: dynachrome
This is laughable - imagine the pollution saved by a single Zoom meeting that replaces what was once endless time spent flying around the world.
27
posted on
03/18/2025 11:30:33 AM PDT
by
The Duke
(Not without incident.)
To: dynachrome
To quantify the human cost of carbon-emitting technology, researchers use the 1,000-ton rule that estimates that for every 1,000 tons of carbon dioxide released into the atmosphere, one person dies prematurely.The question is: How prematurely?
Five years earlier than he would otherwise have died?!
Five months?!
Five minutes?!
Maybe they mean that one thousand new-borns would have their remaining life-expectancy shortened by one-tenth of one percent. That would be approx. four weeks.
This is insane!
NOTE: The volanco Kīlauea, located on the Big Island of Hawai'i, emits approximately 10,000 metric tons of carbon dioxide per day.
That means that TEN PEOPLE die every day because of that volcano!
Shouldn't the Volcano Lodge (hotel) on the lip of the crater, where tourists stay so they can gawk at the fountains of lava, be required to pay a tax? And the postcard manufacturers who sell picture postcards of the eruption? Should they have to pay a surcharge?
Regards,
28
posted on
03/18/2025 12:03:28 PM PDT
by
alexander_busek
(Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.)
To: sonova
To: dynachrome
In the neverending chain of what-ifs...what if there is a threshold, and a warming of, say, 1.7 °C instead of 2.0 °C causes NO EXCESS DEATHS AT ALL? (Just as possible as any other scenario at this point.) Are these freaks going to apologize and pay reparations for all the chaos they have caused along the way?
30
posted on
03/18/2025 5:52:17 PM PDT
by
Moltke
(Reasoning with a liberal is like watering a rock in the hope to grow a building.)
To: John Milner
For every email signature, an angel gets its wings.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-31 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson