Posted on 01/23/2025 6:43:11 AM PST by delta7
yes, indeed it is. It says that a President can issue reprieves and pardons FOR offenses committed against the United States.
The Constitution plainly limits pardons to be applied FOR offenses committed otherwise the word “for” would not have been included.
”I believe that the President has complete authority when it comes to granting a pardon”
I believe it at a President is limited to language as written in the Constitution. You say you’ve read it so perhaps you can quote the text where he can pardon anything other than for an offense committed against the United States. Remember, if it’s not in the Constitution, it doesn’t exist except.at the state level.
Schiffty got a pardon for his crimes. He no longer has that pardon? Uh, oh.
“However, nobody pressed the issue because it would have torn the country apart.”
Seems like Armstrong/Delta7 has forgotten that he predicted that a US civil would break out this week ...
“The ad hominem attacks roll in like Santa Ana winds.”
I notice that you do not deny the truth of those posts ...
“This article is fabulous and needs to be sent to every US Senator and Congressman.”
Armstrong is a Putin apologist and a convicted scammer.
He is just trolling for suckers.
$150 a month.
Ad hominem attacks are attacks on the person—regardless of whether the attacks are true or not.
Person A says “the sky is blue”.
Person B says “Person A is a known liar”.
Person B has made an ad hominen attack on person A.
Meanwhile “the sky is blue” statement is neither affirmed nor rejected.
I notice that you do not refutes the truth of those posts.
And, those posts are made to make it known that Armstrong is a convicted liar and scammer.
His predictions are worthless, only designed to scam money from suckers.
You have stated this hundreds of times on dozens of posts.
At some point there is a remote possibility that some folks might have gotten the message.
:-)
“At some point there is a remote possibility that some folks might have gotten the message.”
Some may have. Others may not have.
..... wondering why you keep coming on these threads ...
I am studying obsessive compulsive disorder.
Armstrong threads seems to draw such folks.
You have stated this hundreds of times on dozens of posts.That's a fallacy.
At some point there is a remote possibility that some folks might have gotten the message.
“I am studying obsessive compulsive disorder.
Armstrong threads seems to draw such folks.”
Be honest.
You are not studying. You are an active participant having made many posts.
Do you believe this particular post (not past ones, this one) was posted by Armstrong or someone from his organization?
If so, please share any evidence you have (again on this post, not past ones).
Do you believe this particular post (not past ones, this one) was posted by Armstrong or someone from his organization? If so, please share any evidence you have (again on this post, not past ones).Why is this important? What do you want? That's irrelevant. Or, again, relevant only on a stochastic basis. I am saying that Armstrong has had a commercial activity going on here for years. This has been pointed out by other members. Fairly obvious. One would have to be naive to think otherwise. Hundreds of verbatim copies of blog posts from his scam blog which appeared here on schedule.
“Do you believe this particular post (not past ones, this one) was posted by Armstrong or someone from his organization?
If so, please share any evidence you have (again on this post, not past ones).”
If it is the same person, proof from a previous post is sufficient.
Usually, blog shills are quickly zotted.
But this one lives on inspite of it being known that Armstrong is a lying fraud who has been convicted of running a ponzi scheme.
The only success he has had in life is scamming suckers.
Two personal bankruptsies.
Lost $700,000,000 of clients’ money.
Eleven years in prison.
“Good advice. It is interesting to note also the TxGators and Moneyback types do not post articles, only criticisms, and attacks.”
I post facts which not once have been disputed by you.
Facts like you predicted that a US civil war would start this week resulting in four new countries in 2026.
“Every one of the posters here on FR who immediately started with an Ad Hominem attack on the author rather than looking at the merits of his words should be looked at as a deep state propagandist on FR.
Not saying they are, but are they showing their hand?”
Interesting that you immediately make an Ad Hominem ( memo word of see day) attack on those posting the truth rather than looking at the merits of the posts.
I have earlier described those that shill for a convicted scammer whose only financial success has been in separating suckers from their money.
The hardness that you carry in your heart for this person is only harming you.
I say these words in Love and not criticism.
If you hold anger in your heart toward someone, you attach your soul to them and give them power over you. You give them free rent in your head.
That does not mean that you lose discernment and become vulnerable. Learn from your experience and become wise.
I have learned some life’s most greatest and most valuable lessons from people with impure motives who harmed me.
🙏
“The hardness that you carry in your heart for this person is only harming you.”
Where did you get that idea?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.