I bet you cried yourself asleep for years and years after the US did this.
Madeleine Albright justifies the deaths of 500,000 Iraqi children as "worth it"
Posted on 09/04/2024 7:01:42 AM PDT by hardspunned
Quite the inspired analysis from Zlatti71. He’s a real genius. What other possible use could they have for those missiles?
“Prove to me this didnt happen. Until then, pray for a just peace.”
Welcome to FR. What brought you to join us yesterday?
Prove to me that strike intentionally targeted random civilians.
Those are gonna leave a mark when they make it to the theater of operations.
Believers in war have swallowed their own propaganda. America is invincible. We can take Russia in a week, China too. NATO can finish Russia in less time—On to Moscow! BUT—War has a nasty habit of taking on a life of its own. Democratic Progressives see a short war that will break an independent Russia in a few weeks or months. It looks possible on paper. But, the people do not want war—so an atrocity needs to happen—a terrible event that will get all Americans to hate Putin—they need a Pearl Harbor attack. If will not do they job—we will goad Iran into it—or even bomb one of our own cities—a Red City would be best—at a Trump Rally and take him out too. Election cancelled—Harris appointed President with Obama/Soros calling all the shots. Once firmly in power a UN sponsored peace—and America can start with the Worker’s Paradise so many want. People will be escaping to Cuba for freedom. The wall will be built to keep Americans in.
I bet you cried yourself asleep for years and years after the US did this.
Madeleine Albright justifies the deaths of 500,000 Iraqi children as "worth it"
BS. There was no real reason for an invasion. It is clear that they haven’t succeeded. Time to go home and try to forget they ever tried to do this.
Two wrongs do not make a right.
Um, have you found “inspired analysis” in the West YET in 30 months? I haven’t. I do look for inspired analysis. I find it everyday from this source. Perhaps, this is not your cup of tea. That’s ok. Thanks for your input.
Two wrongs do not make a right.
But three lefts do!
But does make you a hypocrite.
Probably cant be one way or the other. Deliberate or not, the blame is on the person who launched.
NATO did no such thing
Yes very simple. As long as Russia stays where it was in 2022 there is no chance Ukraine gets into NATO. Which means the NATO expansion reasoning for invading is just silly. In fact to invade Ukraine to prevent NATO is about as as bad a strategy as one could think. It absolutely backfired. Think about it: If you wanted to prevent Ukraine from joining NATO, all you had to do was to continue sitting where you were in 2022. That simple. Or Russia could have said, we will pull out of Crimea/Donbas if Ukraine agrees to stop pursuing NATO.
There is reason to believe that nuclear launch authorization has been delegated to military officials below the Kremlin level—to assure the preservation of most of the Russian nuclear force in the event of leadership decapitation.
Firing missiles deep into the Soviet Union could trigger a nuclear war—by accident.
All it takes is one jumpy Russian general or admiral.
Z needs to be locked up—he is dangerous to all children and other living things.
Russia thinks it has a reason called survival. Like we thought of survival when Russia wanted to put nukes in Cuba.
Same for Russia. Putin has been meddling in Ukrainian affairs since he took power. The Maidan put an end to it.
Where did I approve of what happened to the Iraqi children?
This going to be a repeat of Guns of August, but with nukes.
OK, Russia has a bad strategy according to you. Unfortunately, Russia doesn’t care what you think of their strategy.
I propose Russia doesnt think at all.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.