Skip to comments.
The Rock That Fooled Scientists: No Signs of Early Life
Scitech Daily ^
| August 24, 2024
| University of Ottawa
Posted on 08/30/2024 9:04:10 PM PDT by SunkenCiv
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-27 next last
"Our study focuses on chemical sedimentary rocks found in the Saglek-Hebron. These rocks, among the oldest on Earth, dating back 3.9 billion years, are created through oceanic precipitation," said Jonathan O'Neil, associate professor in the Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences.Credit: University of Ottawa |
1
posted on
08/30/2024 9:04:10 PM PDT
by
SunkenCiv
To: StayAt HomeMother; Ernest_at_the_Beach; 1ofmanyfree; 21twelve; 24Karet; 2ndDivisionVet; 31R1O; ...
2
posted on
08/30/2024 9:04:43 PM PDT
by
SunkenCiv
(Putin should skip ahead to where he kills himself in the bunker.)
To: annie laurie; Knitting A Conundrum; Viking2002; Ernest_at_the_Beach; Mmogamer; fragrant abuse; ...
3
posted on
08/30/2024 9:06:05 PM PDT
by
SunkenCiv
(Putin should skip ahead to where he kills himself in the bunker.)
To: SunkenCiv
That’s a pretty smart rock to fool scientists.
4
posted on
08/30/2024 9:07:26 PM PDT
by
DannyTN
To: SunkenCiv
Science is not “settled”.
5
posted on
08/30/2024 9:11:20 PM PDT
by
Repeal The 17th
(Get out of the matrix and get a real life.)
To: SunkenCiv
“The study shows that the petrographic, geochemical, and spectroscopic features in the graphite (the crystalline form of carbon) found in the Saglek-Hebron chemical sedimentary rocks are in fact “abiotic,” that is, nonliving physical or chemical aspects of an environment or devoid of life.”
I remember the documentary about what happened last time they said that, it was called “The Devil in the Dark”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q4338D9W9hM
6
posted on
08/30/2024 9:19:02 PM PDT
by
algore
To: algore
7
posted on
08/30/2024 9:43:15 PM PDT
by
SunkenCiv
(Putin should skip ahead to where he kills himself in the bunker.)
To: SunkenCiv
Did they find it in the Hudson?
8
posted on
08/30/2024 9:43:22 PM PDT
by
SaveFerris
(Luke 17:28 ... as it was in the days of Lot; they did eat, they drank, they bought, they sold ......)
To: SaveFerris
9
posted on
08/30/2024 9:54:00 PM PDT
by
SunkenCiv
(Putin should skip ahead to where he kills himself in the bunker.)
To: Repeal The 17th
10
posted on
08/30/2024 9:54:25 PM PDT
by
SunkenCiv
(Putin should skip ahead to where he kills himself in the bunker.)
To: DannyTN
It just shows that IQ is not necessarily dependent on the Mohs hardness scale.
To: DannyTN
So I guess it’s OK to be “dumb as a rock”.
To: SunkenCiv
The study shows that the petrographic, geochemical, and spectroscopic features in the graphite (the a crystalline form of carbon) [...]Please!
Regards,
13
posted on
08/30/2024 11:39:54 PM PDT
by
alexander_busek
(Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.)
To: algore
I remember the documentary about what happened last time they said that, it was called “The Devil in the Dark” But that was a silicon-based lifeform.
Regards,
14
posted on
08/30/2024 11:40:54 PM PDT
by
alexander_busek
(Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.)
To: SunkenCiv
Does anyone want a doorstop?
15
posted on
08/30/2024 11:54:59 PM PDT
by
Bullish
(...And just like that, I was dropped from the ping-list)
To: DannyTN
"That’s a pretty smart rock to fool scientists." Don't rule out the possibility of not very smart 'scientists'.
16
posted on
08/31/2024 3:03:03 AM PDT
by
norwaypinesavage
(Freud: projection is a defense mechanism of those struggling with inferiority complexes)
To: SunkenCiv
Next they’ll say rocks are more alive than fetuses.
17
posted on
08/31/2024 4:03:42 AM PDT
by
bgill
To: SunkenCiv
Review the overall dynamic geologic cycle, note the great amounts of time it takes for one fully complete cycle. The answer should be evident. Science is rife with individuals bent on making a name for themselves. The pushback is usually a symptom of self aggrandizement, aka pride.
18
posted on
08/31/2024 5:02:26 AM PDT
by
Clutch Martin
("The trouble ain't that there is too many fools, but that the lightning ain't distributed right." )
To: SunkenCiv
To this day, scientists still do not understand how life evolved from non-life. (”Is Atheism Dead?”, Eric Metaxas ... worthy of your most serious consideration)
19
posted on
08/31/2024 5:07:28 AM PDT
by
glennaro
(2024: The Year of The Reckoning, lest our Republic succumb to the "progressive" disease of the Left)
To: SunkenCiv
I don’t want to do the research but IMO since there became “science” 97% of scientists have been initially wrong 100% of time about everything.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-27 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson