Amazing Fetal Development Photos more at link] Confirm Human Life Begins at Conception

lifenews.com ^ | Sep 16, 2014 | Sarah Terzo

[daniel1212]

Also see, https://people.southwestern.edu/~bednarb/su_netWorks/projects/saenz/photogallery.html Source: M. Allen et. al., "The Limits of Viability." New England Journal of Medicine. 11/25/93: Vol. 329, No. 22, p. 1597. http://www.prolife.com/FETALDEV.html.

Esp. applicable here to those "conservatives" who criticize making abortion an election issue under the premise that it is "not a winnable position," while the reason that it is not is because, as part of the decline of basic Biblical Christianity, conservatives have largely ceased to make what has been scientifically and graphically obvious for decades, which is the Biblical truth that what has been conceived in the womb is not some mere blob of tissue growth, but a human entity, which is to be valued as much and more than the nested egg of a migratory bird, which by law is protected from harm.

And as regards the typical red herring recourse of liberals, 98% of abortions are due to reasons other than rape, incest:

As for the "my body, my right" reasoning, why is that right not provided for the human being that resulted from choosing (in 98% of all cases) to engage in sexual relations - which the female body is designed to achieve conception by?

Even if someone you invited into your car or house secretly brings a child with them without your consent, then you simply do not have the right to exterminate that life, which is not a lethal threat to you. In some states, you cannot even shoot suspected burglars unless they manifestly endanger lives, much less a lost vulnerable child who finds a way into your house since you left the door open.

So in order to justify the “pro-choice” position - which is denying the subject of extermination any choice in the matter, and is contrary to the normal course of nature - then one must deny that what is inside the womb is a human person (unless pro-choice promoters are willing to be classed as murderers, which they are).

And thus the pro anti-infant choice promoter must justify their basis for determining that.

Will it be the ability to function on its own, though it rather shortly will be able to? If so, then you had best not be laid up for a while if needing life-sustaining support.

And of course, most aged in nursing homes could thus be turned into sources of protein.

Will it be based upon location, meaning outside the womb killing the infant would be murder, but before that it is open game?

Or will the unborn human life be valued at least as much as the eggs of protected migratory birds are?

[gattaca]

Amazing! Thanks for posting.

[daniel1212]

https://i.abcnewsfe.com

[daniel1212]

Amazing! Thanks for posting.

Yes, and yet the GOP refuses to make this an issue. As well as LGBTQ. Many "Christians" as well.

[mairdie]

It certainly shows why the 2nd trimester deserves protection. Very nice article.

[SaveFerris]

Nancy Pelosi was unavailable for comment as she was too busy serving Satan, the god of this world (2nd Corinthians 4:3-4)

Yeah, the slaughter of the unborn - now THERE'S a priority!!!

A Godless, Reprobate, spirit-of-antichrist generation that worships Moloch.



What many Americans voted for in November, 2008:

[ComputerGuy]

An excellent post.

[Thomas Jerome]

Unfortunately, pro life, is the losing side to take on the issue.

[tired&retired]

Life begins at conception when a sperm and egg join in the fallopian tube. The sperm fertilizes the egg and creates a zygote. The zygote begins its journey down to your uterus over the course of about one week.

During this journey, the zygote divides many times, eventually creating two separate structures.

Without Life, the zygote would not form, or divide.

[left that other site]

I AM FEARFULLY AND WONDERFULLY MADE...PSALM 139:14

[goo goo g'joob]

Day 1: Sperm joins with ovum, to form one cell smaller than a grain of salt. The new life has inherited 23 chromosomes from each parent, 46 in all.

This is powerful info to interject into the "when does life begin" argument.

Removing "life" from the conversation, the fact remains that "at conception" some "entity" now exists that has "human DNA" in a combination that never in all of history has existed.

[metmom]

It's Easy to Be Pro Choice When You aren't The One Being Killed Bumper Sticker (Life Christianity Anti roe)

https://www.amazon.com/American-Vinyl-Choice-Sticker-Christianity/dp/B0756PVKWP

[MS.BEHAVIN]

This is an old grainy photo, but look carefully, and you will see a baby grabbing the finger of the surgeon who was bringing her INTO the world via a C-Section.

It’s a very moving picture!
https://www.smalljoys.tv/womb-baby-grabs-doctors-finger-7/

[metmom]

Unfortunately, pro life, is the losing side to take on the issue.

Not in God's eyes.

[telescope115]

Great info! It never ceases to amaze me when seeing pictures of the fetus in development that it is truly miraculous. Thank you.

[Thomas Jerome]

You’re right about that. This is politics...about as far away from God you can get.

[daniel1212]

It's Easy to Be Pro Choice When You aren't The One Being Killed Bumper Sticker (Life Christianity Anti roe)

In-deed! Thanks.

[daniel1212]

Removing "life" from the conversation, the fact remains that "at conception" some "entity" now exists that has "human DNA" in a combination that never in all of history has existed.

Yes, and if science actually discovered a "gay" or liberal gene, that strongly corresponded to future ideology, then progressive pro-life centers in lib areas would be found.

[daniel1212]

I AM FEARFULLY AND WONDERFULLY MADE...PSALM 139:14

Indeed, thus the devil seeks to destroy or pervert it.

[daniel1212]

Unfortunately, pro life, is the losing side to take on the issue.

Unfortunately, pro choice is the losing side to take on the issue. See https://freerepublic.com/focus/news/4260313/posts?page=115#115

https://freerepublic.com/focus/news/4260313/posts?page=121#121