“Eligibility” Censorship on Full Display at YouTube

The Post & Email Newspaper ^ | 16 Aug 2024 | Sharon Rondeau

[philman_36]

Problem is, there already exists law against anchor babies.

On the contrary. US law itself creates anchor babies. See my reply above.

Harris and many others are nothing more than USC 8 citizens.

[philman_36]

Bah!
...brush this issue off...

[Nifster]

Oh okay you’re right and the plain language of the constitution is wrong

Keep yammering maybe you’ll get there

[Nifster]

Precisely

[Nifster]

You have heard incorrectly

[sten]

Any ‘law’ that contradicts the Constitution is itself null and void.

If you want to mint soil-based baby Americans then you’ll need to repeal the 14th first.

Until then, anything else is weakly held until crushed at the supreme Court as being in violation

[philman_36]

...the plain language of the constitution is wrong

What plain language is that?

[Nifster]

And you are wrong no matter what you think

[philman_36]

Perhaps you should see this...
Laity Acquires “Certified” Naturalization Documentation for Donald J. Harris, Father of Kamala Harris ...documents from the National Archives showing that Harris’s father, Donald Jasper Harris, naturalized as a U.S. citizen in September 1981, nearly 17 years after Kamala’s birth in Oakland, CA.

[philman_36]

If you want to mint soil-based baby Americans then you’ll need to repeal the 14th first.

BS! Anchor babies don't need no stinking 14th Amendment.
That Amendment applied to previous slaves only in a one shot deal.
And THAT is why subsequent Immigration and Naturalization laws were enacted.

[A strike]

Are you claiming that the 1898 case United States v. Wong Kim Ark is determinative re the US Constitution’s Natural Born Citizen requirement ?
That is not in evidence.

[philman_36]

You say it without showing it. Why is that?

[A strike]

Precisely wrong

[DiogenesLamp]

That is the current state of the law.

Meaning this is what the current ignorant Judges will enforce as the law, but is not the same thing as to what the law really is according to original intent.

That makes Harris a citizen a birth (natural born citizen).

No it doesn't. Naturalized citizens are *NOT* natural born citizens.

Harris gets her citizenship through the 14th amendment, and only through the 14th amendment, therefore she is a naturalized citizen.

[DiogenesLamp]

And yet you lose, and you lose, and you lose every battle.

Derick Chauvin is in prison for "murder", though he didn't kill anyone.

The courts are insane, and "losing" in an incompetent ignorant court system doesn't change the truth.

[philman_36]

Harris gets her citizenship through the 14th amendment, and only through the 14th amendment...

WRONG! When was she ever a slave? The 14th Amendment granted citizenship to former slaves, nobody else.

14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution: Civil Rights (1868) National Archives

Following the Civil War, Congress submitted to the states three amendments as part of its Reconstruction program to guarantee equal civil and legal rights to Black citizens. A major provision of the 14th Amendment was to grant citizenship to “All persons born or naturalized in the United States,” thereby granting citizenship to formerly enslaved people.

She is a USC 8, naturalized citizen.

[Does so]

Enough Diversity...

[philman_36]

“All persons born or naturalized in the United States,”

How is that naturalization performed? THROUGH STATUTES ENACTED BY CONGRESS, not through Constitutional Amendments.

[Fuzz]

That sentence in quotes there. Did you read it?

[philman_36]

Did you read it?

Are you under some impression that I didn't?