Posted on 12/19/2023 6:29:17 PM PST by nickcarraway
It’s the dosing that gets a person, while the elephant in the room that’s even worse is the massive quantities of sugar it’s mixed into that cancer feeds on. Pray over your food and thank God for His abundant provision, remembering “...and if you drink any deadly poison it will in no way harm you.”
Never heard of “Swedish Fish, Jolly Ranchers, and Twizzlers”.
My late Uncle told me a variant of this joke:
Heaven:
Japanese wife
English House
Chinese Cook
American Salary
Hell:
American wife
Japanese house
English cook
Chinese salary
You are lucky.
what would trayvon do without his skittles....
upon banning red dye No. 3 from cosmetics in 1990, the FDA downplayed its dangers, noting that the risk of developing cancer from the dye appeared to be less than 1 in 100,000—small compared to the risk of natural disasters (70 in 100,000) or the risk of a train or plane crash (6 in 100,000). Representatives of the food industry had similar messages, with one industry study reportedly saying a person would have to eat 724,000 cans of fruit cocktail a year for 70 years to ingest an equivalent amount of red dye No. 3 as the rats fed the high 4 percent diet dose
“The UK prides itself on high food standards…”
Yeah, prove it. I’ve lived there; it’s all shite.
Reading the ingredients on a food container, you need a degree in Chemistry to know what you are eating!!
So true! Cote d’Or chocolate is no longer the same either 😪 🤧
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.