Massie: Here's the 118 Reps who voted against FISA in the NDAA (143 were needed ...)

Twitter/X ^ | Dec 14 | Rep. Thomas Massie

[zeugma]

Identify the logical difference:
Some can’t be trusted not to abuse FISA, therefore ban FISA.
Some can’t be trusted not to abuse ARs, therefore ban AR’s.

In addition to being completely ignorant about the 2nd amendment, you might want to take a look at the 4th as well.

The 2nd Amendment to the U.S. Constitution:
A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.

The 4th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution:

The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

So your the idiocy springing from your keyboard is defeated by not one, but two separate provisions in the Constitution.

Your handlers would be advised to read the document some time, as should you.

[DugwayDuke]

zeugma wrote: “Your handlers would be advised to read the document some time, as should you.”

So, you admit that there is no logiical difference.

[zeugma]

Wow. your stupidity is impressive.

[DugwayDuke]

zeugma wrote: “Wow. your stupidity is impressive.”

You would be more impressive if you took a class in logic.