Be SURE TO GET THESE NEW SHOTS!
Posted on 10/18/2023 4:41:23 AM PDT by tired&retired
“Showing an article written by Dr. McCullough to you Branch Covidians is like showing the cross to a vampire.”
McCullough is my favorite Big Conspiracy shill. The epitome of the Never Give a Sucker an Even Break philosophy. That guy has a perfect understanding of his target audience.
Is there some reason that McCullough doesn’t publish his findings on peer reviewed sites like Nature or PubMed? Or Lancet?
I mean as an MD he knows where the medical world goes for peer reviewed studies.
A substack page called Courageous Discourse is something that only the lay public is going to see. Surely that is entirely unintentional by the good Dr McCullough
Nah......the FR $$s deny this, to this day.....evil minions that they are.
Is there some reason that McCullough doesn’t publish his findings on peer reviewed sites like Nature or PubMed? Or Lancet?
Yes.
Specifically, so $hill Pelham can have a whiny, meltdown $hot event, of his/her own.
At least, that is what I’ve been told 🤷♀️
Big Conspiracy mad!
If you are unaware of the medical journal publishing bias, I suggest you research further
Re: 13 - LOL!
Yeah right.
Be SURE TO GET THESE NEW SHOTS!
Nothing questioning the quacksines was allowed.
Dr Byram Bridle, Cdn vaccines developer who is against the cv19vx got death threats simply for speaking out about the cv19vx. And of course he faced a campaign by his own colleagues who refused to debate him.
Answer me one question. Why have all the attempts to have an open debate on the cv19vx been refused? Do you believe, like that c*** Peter Hotez that no debates should ever take place (because science) because, you know...no one should question the quackseen?
I’m aware that Big Conspiracy loves to pretend that its farcical pay to play web “journals” are real.
I believe there certainly should be debate but my observation is the debate should be within the scientific realm which is carried out in a wide survey of well thought out studies. There is no doubt studies on both sides and I think the debate it progressing adequately.
What has been proposed or bread and circuses.
“the quackseen”
Lol. A new cutesy name for the endlessly scary mRNA substance.
I’ll miss the jab and clot$hot lunacy when the conspiracy nuts find some new bright shiny object to obsess about.
Well, of course Pharma and the medical community have a duty to prove the cv19vx safe, and as we are now seeing from Pfizer’s own trial data, that is very much in question, to say the least. I am not sure what “circus” you are referring to. Dr Byram Bridle is a vaccine proponent. He has offered to debate at location and with an independent moderator of you side’s choosing. All offers by all parties on your side have been refused because the debate promotes “hesitancy”, which of course is a public relations argument, not a scientific one. Let’s have a full, in-depth debate and stop pretending that experts cannot be experts unless they agree with your side (the side of Fauci and Hotez).
Have you considered an accelerated booster subscription?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.