Posted on 10/11/2023 8:58:31 PM PDT by know.your.why
I beg to differ. Much experience in this regard, expanding with use of drone-mounted cameras. There is zero deflection from the detonation wave which would have imparted a physical motion differing from the smooth transition to the right. Additionally, a tripod would have imparted a shaken image; the only image distortion was from the blast wave itself (sans video analysis, which I won’t be performing).
In fact, it’s probably a drone, zoomed in from some distance away, covertly loitering at a low altitude so as not to become a target. From my chair, it’s clear that the camera was focused upon point of impact and panned slightly to get the whole building, probably due to an operator looking at a small screen.
My bet is that Israel is using drones as artillery/airstrike spotters and that that was a leaked video of a strike. Furthermore, the framerate/resolution/stabilization of that video appears impressively high, placing it well above ‘consumer’ level products.
This weapon is not used just to destroy a building. It is used to destroy what is beneath the building.…
Of course, what is below the building supports the building. So that comes down too. LOL
Good suggestion...going back to watch it in slo-mo.
Absolutely! So many great sketch comedians came from the original Canadian era
Thank you!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.