Posted on 10/09/2023 2:38:19 PM PDT by frogjerk
NotTexasGator is a resurrected troll.
In the General/Chat forum, on a thread titled Celebrity chef, Food Network host Michael Chiarello dead at 61, Jane Long wrote: NotTexasGator is a resurrected troll.
It does sound familiar. Thanks.
From VAERS own “Guide to Interpreting VAERS Data”
(you know, the part that you always leave out when posting VAERS data; because including the VAERS disclaimer spoils your little game of cause & effect)
“When evaluating data from VAERS, it is important to note that for any reported event, no cause-and-effect relationship has been established. Reports of all possible associations between vaccines and adverse events (possible side effects) are filed in VAERS. Therefore, VAERS collects data on any adverse event following vaccination, be it coincidental or truly caused by a vaccine. The report of an adverse event to VAERS is not documentation that a vaccine caused the event.”
“Millions of vaccines are given each year to children less than 1 year old in the United States, usually between 2 and 6 months of age. At this age, infants are at greatest risk for certain medical adverse events, including high fevers, seizures, and sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS). Some infants will experience these medical events shortly after a vaccination by coincidence.
These coincidences make it difficult to know whether a particular adverse event resulted from a medical condition or from a vaccination. Therefore, vaccine providers are encouraged to report all adverse events following vaccination, whether or not they believe the vaccination was the cause.”
https://vaers.hhs.gov/data/dataguide.html
In the General/Chat forum, on a thread titled Celebrity chef, Food Network host Michael Chiarello dead at 61, Pelham wrote: From VAERS own “Guide to Interpreting VAERS Data”
(you know, the part that you always leave out when posting VAERS data; because including the VAERS disclaimer spoils your little game of cause & effect)
“When evaluating data from VAERS, it is important to note that for any reported event, no cause-and-effect relationship has been established. Reports of all possible associations between vaccines and adverse events (possible side effects) are filed in VAERS. Therefore, VAERS collects data on any adverse event following vaccination, be it coincidental or truly caused by a vaccine. The report of an adverse event to VAERS is not documentation that a vaccine caused the event.”
“Millions of vaccines are given each year to children less than 1 year old in the United States, usually between 2 and 6 months of age. At this age, infants are at greatest risk for certain medical adverse events, including high fevers, seizures, and sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS). Some infants will experience these medical events shortly after a vaccination by coincidence.
These coincidences make it difficult to know whether a particular adverse event resulted from a medical condition or from a vaccination. Therefore, vaccine providers are encouraged to report all adverse events following vaccination, whether or not they believe the vaccination was the cause.”
"(you know, the part that you always leave out when posting VAERS data; because including the VAERS disclaimer spoils your little game of cause & effect)"
False. I have posted that VAERS is a safety signal, not cause and effect, and then posted content to show that the CDC is ignoring the clear, obvious safety signal.
It's not a coincidence if someone gets an injection and collapses the same day with symptoms of anaphylaxis. I agree not all symptoms reported to VAERS are caused by the vaccine. I point out that the CDC has no threshold by which it will deem a symptom worth investigation. I don't make that claim on my own knowledge but upon the expertise of mathematicians who demonstrated that the CDC's algorithm for the Covid vaccine was literally impossible to cross (trigger an investigation of a safety signal).
If the CDC investigated the Covid 'vax' adverse events like they used to do, I would have no problem with waiting, watching. It used to be 50 deaths would have a product pulled from the market for further study (FDA) but now thousands of people can die and be disabled following the vaccine and it's ALL deemed 'coincidental'. Dr. McCullough has discussed the unprecedented way the Covid 'vaccine' has been allowed to continue administration. It's not pretty.
Pelham your content is always so low wattage I sigh out of boredom responding to you.
"VAERS is subjective reporting that can be filed by anyone. People have something happen to them after a vaccination and believe that the vaccine had to be the cause. Post hoc reasoning."
I watched a video of someone actually filing a VAERS report. The filed report was not posted to VAERS at the conclusion. Instead the filer received a code to use later. The notice VAERS produced said that the CDC has 6 - 8 weeks to review the content. So if someone posted content the CDC didn't like, they don't publish it to VAERS. This is certainly true because statisticians have caught the CDC deleting records that reflect negatively on the Covid 'vaccine.
The “code” is for use in any “follow-up” as needed by the CDC...their report got filed to VAERS as everyone’s is. Go file one yourself. (Pick out a local obit and say “died after the vaxx...”....as legit as many VAERS reports filed).
No. Checking later the report was not filed until weeks later. The CDC has time to intercept useless reports - which was the original assertion that ‘anyone can file anything’.
The report got “filed” as you yourself just stated.
Filed, not published. The CDC reserves for itself 6 - 8 weeks to review content before publishing the report to VAERS. A person cannot publish directly to VAERS - the CDC has to decide whether or not to publish it. So it’s false to say that anyone can put anything on VAERS. The CDC can put anything it decides to publish on VAERS. During the vax rollout, the CDC decided to withhold thousands of records for months (not publish) and then started back filling while holding new reports back.
Vax can cause anaphylaxis according to the CDC
I mean, you guys are right about allergic reactions, I'm just not buying anaphylaxis, unless this guy butchered a fugu or something... He was a Napa Valley chef, had a tapas joint and an Italian wannaba one-star, inoffensive-fusion-garbage-2008-called-and-wants-its-horizontal-stacked-entree-back.
I watched his stupid show a couple of times courtesy of the better half who loves Food Network, and he was an ok goomba; but guys, he cooked every seafood imaginable and ate it. Fava beans, one of the real hidden dangers of allergies since so few chefs utilize them, nope, they went right in with the seafood!
Nah, this is like when Brittany Murphy croaked at home and her batchit-crazy mother floated all kinds of theories until the 10-page toxicology inquest report came back.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.