Posted on 09/13/2023 7:53:54 PM PDT by UMCRevMom@aol.com
You noticed, eh? Never a post about anything else, including the LGBTQWERTY hijacking of the church she's an ordained minister in.
Wall to wall, pro-Youcrayne bullshit, 24/7/365. Is she being paid to do this? Considering the amount of effort required to do this type of massive, daily spam posting, I conclude that she is. Once that's confirmed, this game's over.
They certainly could build everything back up. Especially if Russia manages to massively reform their society.
I hope they don’t reform. That will keep them weak.
But there is always the possibility that they will. That is why this should be treated as a long term problem, and it is why NATO will be needed, probably, until the Second Coming.
“confirmed, this game’s over”
Rocko really mistrusts and does not verify his completely false comments. Ironically, I cannot dispute or search for him because he would not believe anyway.
So, best for me to just leave him alone.
| The international symbol for you are about |
| to read a really stupid comment |
“As far as everyone is concerned, the US (your people, collectively) gave its word. No matter how you kick back at that, it is what it is.”
We have a saying in the US: “Not worth a bucket of warm piss.” Which is what a Bill Clinton promise and an agreement not ratified by the US Senate are worth.
You are bound, regardless. You cannot, individually, reject such a commitment and retain your credibility in the wider world. No amount of private rage will shift that, among peoples who are not you.
As for Clinton or not-Clinton - Ronald Reagan, or any US President, would have signed that, word for word. It meant a major reduction in nuclear risk, which was what he was after. It was a no-brainer at the time, a gimme.
Thanks again, mom!
rxh4n1: That’s BS. What’s going to stop them from rebuilding everything after the war is over? We’ll be out hundreds of billions and back at square one.
Demand for Perfection Fallacy - also known as the "Perfect Solution Fallacy" or "Nirvana Fallacy."
Just because some pygmy remnant of the Russian Federation - let's call it "Greater Muscovy" for convenience - will probably still be left over after this conflict, that's no reason to dismiss the current course of action, which yields many benefits for U.S. security.
"Greater Muscovy" will be out of billions if not trillions, its economy will be in tatters, and it will be much less of a threat to world peace.
Sure, it comes with a price-tag! TANSTAFL!
Regards,
The shame should be on you for helping a thug named Putin and his fellow oligarchs in using aggression to take over his neighbor. The World has become too dangerous a place to allow military aggressors to thrive.
It was Russia that meddled in Ukraine in 2014. Obama did nothing. Putin expected Biden and NATO to do nothing. A miscalculation on his part. Putin is the aggressor here not the U.S.
“The Putin acts of aggression in 2014 became a turning point for some Freepers that chose to support Russians actions against the independent nation of Ukraine.”
Exactly so.
What jurisdiction does Russia have. Putin attacked Ukraine with the intention of quickly overthrowing its government. That overthrow didn’t happen.
Obama didn’t deliver on that guarantee. That’s how Putin gained control over part of Ukraine. Putin figured that a quick campaign would overthrow the Ukrainian government, and the West would do nothing. That didn’t work out for him. Now we’re finally honoring that guarantee.
Obama didn’t deliver on that guarantee. That’s how Putin gained control over part of Ukraine. Putin figured that a quick campaign would overthrow the Ukrainian government, and the West would do nothing. That didn’t work out for him. Now we’re finally honoring that guarantee.
Sure, it comes with a price-tag! TANSTAFL!
Regards,
“Greater Muscovy”? You and what army? Ukraine ain’t gonna do it. It would would take the USA, that’s who, and we ain’t gonna do it. You’re another one of those foreigners with no skin in the game warmongering around here.
“You are bound, regardless. You cannot, individually, reject such a commitment and retain your credibility in the wider world. No amount of private rage will shift that, among peoples who are not you.”
No rage, scorn for your gullibility. That anyone, after all this, would believe Bill Clinton on anything.
The Russian Army.
Maybe aided by a mercenary army.
Who took down the U.S.S.R.? Certainly not any foreign army!
Regards,
What have we got here, Donetsk Denys instead of Baghdad Bob?
A pox on both their houses: Russia and Ukraine, Senate and House of Representatives.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.