Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

vermectin Reduces Excess Deaths by 74%, New Study Shows
Slay ^ | September 2,2023 | David Lindfield

Posted on 09/03/2023 4:11:35 PM PDT by Hojczyk

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-39 last
To: Owen

Spoken like a true, $hot defending Gov’t plant, Owen. Can’t have any info not FRAUDci/CDC/JAMA approved, now, can we?

About Cureus

The Open Access medical journal for a new generation of doctors, researchers and patients.
We’re eliminating barriers to the generation and dissemination of medical knowledge.

The Cureus Difference

Based in San Francisco, California, Cureus is a Springer Nature journal leveraging the power of an online, crowdsourced community platform to share and promote published medical knowledge around the world.

Journal Metrics
Readership
3.4M

Monthly Reads

1.2M

Monthly Readers

Publication
33 Days

Avg. Time from Submission to Publication

51%

Acceptance Rate

1.5 Days

Avg. Time to First Decision

31%

Accepted Articles Published for Free


21 posted on 09/03/2023 6:11:34 PM PDT by Jane Long (What we were told was a conspiracy theory in ‘20 is now fact. Land of the sheep, home of the knaves)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Tom Tetroxide

https://www.ivermectin.com/

Have you dealt with that company before? If you have how was the experience?

I am looking to have some ivermectin on hand.

Thanks


22 posted on 09/03/2023 6:14:18 PM PDT by Irish Eyes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Owen
It’s not JAMA, Lancet or NE Journal.

Not really an argument. These journals have beclowned themselves. They proved themselves to be mouthpieces of the blob.

They are veracity-free information sources.

23 posted on 09/03/2023 6:19:09 PM PDT by 13foxtrot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Owen

Your western bias is showing to discount the bona fides of this medical journal from South America

“The paper’s results were published on August 8 in the renowned peer-reviewed Cureus Journal of Medical Science.”

The study
https://www.cureus.com/articles/172991-covid-19-excess-deaths-in-perus-25-states-in-2020-nationwide-trends-confounding-factors-and-correlations-with-the-extent-of-ivermectin-treatment-by-state#!/

Here’s another study of 88,000 subjects using IVM preventatively

https://www.cureus.com/articles/111851-regular-use-of-ivermectin-as-prophylaxis-for-covid-19-led-up-to-a-92-reduction-in-covid-19-mortality-rate-in-a-dose-response-manner-results-of-a-prospective-obse

Regular Use of Ivermectin as Prophylaxis for COVID-19 Led Up to a 92% Reduction in COVID-19 Mortality Rate in a Dose-Response Manner: Results of a Prospective Observational Study of a Strictly Controlled Population of 88,012 Subjects


24 posted on 09/03/2023 6:21:32 PM PDT by silverleaf (Inside Every Progressive Is A Totalitarian Screaming To Get Out” —David Horowitz)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Owen

I can’t speak to the value of this “study”. But JAMA, Lancet and NE Journal have thoroughly beclowned themselves in the last decade.

Outside of supervising the study myself - which I am not qualified to do - I am not inclined to place a lot of trust in any of the above. They are highly politicized.

Who can we trust anymore medically speaking? Dunno. But after the last 3 years I certainly don’t trust the corporate medical establishment.


25 posted on 09/03/2023 6:28:34 PM PDT by ChildOfThe60s ( If you can remember the 60s.....you weren't really there..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: patriot torch

The reason that the CDC and FDA must suppress the effectiveness of Ivermectin, is that the law authorizing the EUA would prevent the authorization.

https://www.fda.gov/regulatory-information/search-fda-guidance-documents/emergency-use-authorization-medical-products-and-related-authorities#A2

Read down to section D.

d. No Alternatives

For FDA to issue an EUA, there must be no adequate, approved, and available alternative to the candidate product for diagnosing, preventing, or treating the disease or condition.


26 posted on 09/03/2023 7:55:48 PM PDT by taxcontrol (The choice is clear - either live as a slave on your knees or die as a free citizen on your feet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk
Question... What exactly is an 'excess death'?
27 posted on 09/03/2023 8:38:19 PM PDT by jerod (Nazi's were essentially Socialist in Hugo Boss uniforms... Get over it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk

I was an anesthetist in a large, internationally famous medical center where Ebola victims were sent during that crisis. We received the cruise ship passengers from the west coast early in the plandemic. I personally anesthetized numerous covid + patients. Early on, I utilized the space suit respirator equip because I was required to. I was recovering from a radical cancer operation, but really never had any real concerns because I had for a number of years been taking Vit D, Vit C, and zinc as prophylaxis for common viral infections—with good results. As soon as it was available, I got ivermectin from India and began taking it as the best propylaxis. I and many of my more intelligent colleagues sensed that there was a great deal of faulty and suspicious information going on. My family and I never did the lock down or mask BS. We’d put 12 people on our boat and have a great time—every weekend. We kissed and hugged. When the fake vax was released, my clique of fellow anesthetists refused and were eventually granted religious exemptions. Yeah, we were criticized and shunned, but we couldn’t care less. A scary number of our colleagues rushed to get their fake vax’s and had serious cardiac and neurovascular incidents. I begged everyone of my family members to shun the shot. Sadly, many did get the initial vax, to keep their jobs. The right-minded group of my colleagues just knew instinctively that this was all a massive crime-against
humanity. The last year or so of practice before retiring in at the end of 2021, I pretended to utilize protective protocols-—by then just a paper gown and N95 mask—yeah nothing. I induced, ventilated, intubated, extubated numerous covid+ patients and was never really worried. As with AID’s patients, I was always careful, but more because I was concerned about hepatitis and a few other potentially dangerous diseases. Through it all, the most terrifying aspect of covid was the realization that many of my colleagues and “friends” and acquaintances would have very willingly have gone along with opening concentration camps for resisters. We received so much money for our covid (mis)
management that when we closed many of our 75-80 OR’s, we were given clinical review time and received our very lucrative salaries and bonuses. My 50 years in surgery and anesthesia were incredible years with the privilege of seeing first hand some of the most incredible advances and the dawn of a new age of miraculous treatments. Tragically though, my last 2 years of practice left me with the sad realization that only by the Grace of God will the world of the healing arts be resurrected from the depths of corruption that too much of it is now mired in.


28 posted on 09/03/2023 8:55:09 PM PDT by karbine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jane Long

You are absolutely right. What kind of naive fool would insist on relying on the now totally discredited “experts”. I lived it all. No faux vax for me or some of my independent thinking, intelligent anesthesia colleagues. I did no social distancing and happily utilized the common sense prophylaxis that was available from early in the plandemic. I’ve no idea how many supposed covid+ patients I intubated and extubated—probably the most dangerous activity in regards to covid exposure. Though I was recovering from a major radical cancer surgery, I was never really very concerned and would never have submitted to the deadly treatment regimens that killed so many. BTW, far too many of my hypnotized colleagues who loved the JAB suffered serious heart and brain anomalies. The fools who insist on believing only JAMA and Lancet-(admitted falsifying covid data), etc may discount my “anecdotal” evidence—tough shit. These are the same fools who would’ve jumped to support the Aryan racial supperiority doctrines of Sanger and Mengele. God help us.


29 posted on 09/03/2023 9:16:35 PM PDT by karbine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Owen
You want to do a proper study on Ivermectin? Get yourself an array of samples who are selected to have no other factors underway, divide in half. Give half Ivermectin and nothing else. Give the other half placebo. Ensure identical age in the samples, identical locale in the sample, identical nearly everything in the sample. Then compare, and be sure you have a representative sample of the whole planet, not Peru where they had Lambda smash them but nowhere else.

One wonders how it is that a drug with decades worth of medical history in humans behind it, including Nobel prizes for its discovery, yet the entire medical establishment in the western world was calling it 'horse paste'. Huh, you might think that perhaps there was an agenda involved, and not actually the 'science' that was claimed.

The deep state and big pharma appreciates your support.

30 posted on 09/03/2023 10:11:22 PM PDT by zeugma (Stop deluding yourself that America is still a free country.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: 13foxtrot
Not really an argument. These journals have beclowned themselves. They proved themselves to be mouthpieces of the blob.

Indeed. Totally beclowned. screw them

31 posted on 09/03/2023 10:15:51 PM PDT by zeugma (Stop deluding yourself that America is still a free country.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: zeugma

How is that relevant to a proper clinical trial? If you want to propose a different design, great. What is it?


32 posted on 09/03/2023 11:00:29 PM PDT by Owen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Jane Long; maddog55; Hojczyk

“Correction: Ivermectin Prophylaxis Used for COVID-19: A Citywide, Prospective, Observational Study of 223,128 Subjects Using Propensity Score Matching”

“This corrects the article “Ivermectin Prophylaxis Used for COVID-19: A Citywide, Prospective, Observational Study of 223,128 Subjects Using Propensity Score Matching” in volume 14.”

“It has come to the attention of the journal that several authors failed to disclose all relevant conflicts of interest when submitting this article. As a result, Cureus is issuing the following erratum and updating the relevant conflict of interest disclosures to ensure these conflicts of interest are properly described as recommended by the ICMJ:

Lucy Kerr: Paid consultant for both Vitamedic, an ivermectin manufacturer, and Médicos Pela Vida (MPV), an organization that promotes ivermectin as a treatment for COVID-19.

Flavio A. Cadegiani: Paid consultant ($1,600.00 USD) for Vitamedic, an ivermectin manufacturer. Dr. Cadegiani is a founding member of the Front Line COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance (FLCCC), an organization that promotes ivermectin as a treatment for COVID-19.

Pierre Kory: President and Chief Medical Officer of the Front Line COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance (FLCCC), an organization that promotes ivermectin as a treatment for COVID-19. Dr. Kory reports receiving payments from FLCCC. In February of 2022, Dr. Kory opened a private telehealth fee-based service to evaluate and treat patients with acute COVID, long haul COVID, and post-vaccination syndromes.

Jennifer A. Hibberd: Co-founder of the Canadian Covid Care Alliance and World Council for Health, both of which discourage vaccination and encourage ivermectin as a treatment for COVID-19.

Juan J. Chamie-Quintero: Contributor to the Front Line COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance (FLCCC) and lists the FLCCC as his employer on his LinkedIn page.

https://www.cureus.com/articles/82162-ivermectin-prophylaxis-used-for-covid-19-a-citywide-prospective-observational-study-of-223128-subjects-using-propensity-score-matching/correction/126#!/


33 posted on 09/03/2023 11:48:19 PM PDT by Pelham (President Eisenhower. Operation Wetback 1953-54)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Owen

Not my job to design a trial. It was known for decades that this particular drug was extraordinarily safe for humans. There were indications that it could have been helpful. Of course, having an actual treatment would have been extraordinarily unhelpful for the big pharma companies trying to push an experimental treatment on the public for literally billions of dollars. Lord knows we can’t have that. it might cut into your payments, if suddenly there weren’t billions of dollars to throw around at any shill that is willing to push people to take experimental drugs against a virus that wasn’t even particularly dangerous for the vast majority of the population.


34 posted on 09/03/2023 11:57:16 PM PDT by zeugma (Stop deluding yourself that America is still a free country.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: taxcontrol

In addition Ivermectin was left off the list of covered countermeasures.

No inclusion, no liability protection conferred.

No liability protection, no prescription.


35 posted on 09/04/2023 1:55:48 AM PDT by mewzilla (Never give up; never surrender!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Jane Long

The reply was to the worldometer numbers Website which are total BS.


36 posted on 09/04/2023 3:22:22 AM PDT by maddog55 (The only thing systemic in America is the left's hatred of it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Irish Eyes

I haven’t dealt with the company yet, but will do so when I get the extra money to buy some Ivermectin.


37 posted on 09/04/2023 3:49:57 AM PDT by Tom Tetroxide
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: taxcontrol

What I don’t understand is that now that they have been forced to admit alternative cures have always been available, doesn’t this revoke the EUA?

How can they invoke more “new and improved” untested vaccines on the American people without trial testing? And in the face of testing, it’s already been proven ineffective and deadly on the largest test in history.


38 posted on 09/04/2023 5:31:44 AM PDT by patriot torch (..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Jane Long
Not any money to be made off of Ivm.

I don't know about that. IIRC, last time I went to ivermectin.com they were charging $195 for a bottle of 100 12mg tablets that costs almost nothing wholesale.

I'd be interested if someone has an Indian supplier that they've successfully dealt with. Looking into it a while back, they all seemed to be fairly fly-by-night operations (exactly what you expect in India.

39 posted on 09/04/2023 10:58:04 AM PDT by zeugma (Stop deluding yourself that America is still a free country.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-39 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson