In the General/Chat forum, on a thread titled Fukushima nuclear disaster: Japan to release treated water for next 30 years, ransomnote wrote: |
Isotopes indicating active or continuing reaction were detected in ground water. One piece of fuel rod was blown ‘too far’ to have made that transit under the force of conventional explosion. |
Those are some bold claims, right there. But you leave a bit to the imagination.
"Isotopes indicating active or continuing reaction were detected in ground water."
Does this mean that you think that the fuel pellets you claim were "blown up" landed in the mud somewhere and were undergoing nuclear fission, without the benefit of a moderator? That would be quite a result all by itself. And what isotopes were those, anyway? Xenon, maybe? That one has a scary name. Or maybe something else that's only magically there when there's and "active or continuing" reaction. Come to think of it, it's kind of confusing: is there a difference between an "active" reaction and a "continuing" reaction?
But you've saved the really big news for later.
One piece of fuel rod was blown ‘too far’ to have made that transit under the force of conventional explosion.
So it must have been some sort of unconventional explosion, right? You're implying that there was a nuclear explosion, which would bag someone a Nobel prize, just for starters. Do the Iranians know about this? They could stop messing around trying to get 90% enrichment and just use plain old ~5% enriched fuel rods. Please don't tell them, they really can't be trusted.
Do you have any source for this stuff?