Posted on 08/20/2023 9:57:09 AM PDT by RandFan
And Scott Ritter leaving off how he was a whistleblower about how dangerous Saddam Hussein’s / Iraq’s WMDs were and was a thorn in the side of the Clinton Administration claiming they were downplaying the threat / Biden attacking him during his Senate hearing that he wasn’t of a “high enough paygrade” to be criticizing the Clinton Administration. Then after being paid by actors on the other side of the debate did a 180 degree turn and then was the darling of CNN, etc. attacking Bush.
Putin invaded and started a war of his own choice and has been stirring up conflict there internally for many, many years prior. That's the Ukraine truth. He doesn't do that, there would be no war and no conflict. NATO was not planning to invade Russia.
A promise was made to Russia during the GHW Bush Administration that NATO would not expand. NATO broke that promise multiple times.
Early in the Biden Administration, Current US Secretary of State Antony Blinken suggested to current Ukrainian President Zelenskyy that Ukraine could join NATO. After this deliberate provocation to Russia, breaking all previous agreements there would be buffers between NATO countries and Russia, Russia attacked Ukraine.
We know then VP Biden conditioned US taxpayer money for Ukraine only if the Ukrainian prosecutor investigating Ukrainian energy company Burisma was fired.. we know Hunter Biden was handsomely paid as a member of Burisma’s board. Did Ukrainian politicians want US taxpayer dollars? Well , the prosecutor was fired and then President Obama released taxpayer monies to Ukraine.
We know Antony Blinken, Pres. Joe Biden and the 51 former intelligence agents who falsely claimed the Hunter Biden laptop was Russian disinformation, have unclean hands.
Did you like Biden and Blinken’s Afghanistan exit? American soldiers and Afghans who assisted America were as disposable to Biden as a used condom is disposable.
A promise was made to Russia during the GHW Bush Administration that NATO would not expand. NATO broke that promise multiple times.
Early in the Biden Administration, Current US Secretary of State Antony Blinken suggested to current Ukrainian President Zelenskyy that Ukraine could join NATO. After this deliberate provocation to Russia, breaking all previous agreements there would be buffers between NATO countries and Russia, Russia attacked Ukraine.
We know then VP Biden conditioned US taxpayer money for Ukraine only if the Ukrainian prosecutor investigating Ukrainian energy company Burisma was fired.. we know Hunter Biden was handsomely paid as a member of Burisma’s board. Did Ukrainian politicians want US taxpayer dollars? Well , the prosecutor was fired and then President Obama released taxpayer monies to Ukraine.
We know Antony Blinken, Pres. Joe Biden and the 51 former intelligence agents who falsely claimed the Hunter Biden laptop was Russian disinformation, have unclean hands.
Did you like Biden and Blinken’s Afghanistan exit? American soldiers and Afghans who assisted America were as disposable to Biden as a used condom is disposable.
“Tucker is a dim bulb whose faux contrarian act had grown so tired, he was deported to Twitter.”
Now that’s funny.
I implore you to watch the video as Tucker is adored by the president and his ministers.
Tucker doesn’t realize it but quitting Fox and going on twitter / x has given him worldwide fame.
They all wanted pics with Tucker. Says a lot .
Sure he did, and just in time to protect his country and people from being taken over by an ever-expanding NATO, after they broke promise after promise and placed missiles directly on his border -- with promises of more.
You know. Like we did in the 60s when we invaded Cuba and sent our navy out to blockade that sovereign nation island state from Soviet shipping.
See. It's okay to do that.
“Tucker doesn’t want good job creating American energy supplying Europe? What a patriot.”
I’m all for American energy production. Drill baby drill.
I’m also in favor of American exports. US exports were limited by law during the Carter administration. Also, the number of ports capable for liquid natural gas (LNG) exports are limited. President Trump encouraged both oil and gas production and exports. How about Biden? I doubt we have much to export right now.
Should we blow-up a Russian pipeline so that we can have good jobs? No.
We have two conflicting narratives: one of Russian aggression, one of NATO aggression. Of one thing I am certain; we had peace with President Trump. It seems too simple to say that if Biden wants something, it must be wrong. But then again ...
We also had Nordstream2 sanctioned while Trump was POTUS. Putin blew up that pipeline politically when he launched Russia’s latest genocidal war of choice on Ukraine. Whatever happened to it physically after that is immaterial at this point. That’s why, most likely, Russia blew it up. They knew it was never going to be used.
I don’t know. A brief internet search reveals the following from CNN in 2022:
“What is Nord Stream 2 and can Biden kill it?”
https://www.cnn.com/2022/02/08/business/nord-stream-2-germany-biden/index.html
From the article:
“If Russia invades … there will no longer [be] a Nord Stream 2,” Biden said during a joint press conference with Scholz. “We will bring an end to it,” added the American president.
The right way to combat Russian energy influence was pursued by President Trump. Increase US energy production and exports. That is not what Biden chose to do.
Biden happily lifted Trump’s sanctions on Nordstream2. Democrats prefer Russia supply Europe with energy because that reduces demand for production increases in US oil and gas.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.