Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ayn Rand Interview with Tom Snyder (1979)
Youtube ^ | AD Vids

Posted on 08/10/2023 7:23:42 AM PDT by sushiman

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-32 last
To: aquila48

She approved of the founder’s culture but in her mind we got away from that.


21 posted on 08/10/2023 10:19:42 AM PDT by Reily (!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: goo goo g'joob

PFL


22 posted on 08/10/2023 11:06:04 AM PDT by AloneInMass (You'd think there would be more similarity between "chain letter" and "chain mail".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Reily
She’s a Russian Jew! Ayn Rand is her pen name. Her actual name is Anna Rosenbaum. So why would she know much about Christianity?

She wouldn't, not unless she studied it, which people of any background can do.

My point is, a rational person knows what they don't know. But when it comes to Christianity, it seems that every non-Christian feels competent to comment on it without studying it. Atheists do so all the time.

23 posted on 08/10/2023 11:43:06 AM PDT by Angelino97
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: 4Liberty; ADemocratNoMore; Aggie Mama; alarm rider; alexander_busek; AlligatorEyes; antceecee; ...

Rand ping.


24 posted on 08/10/2023 11:49:31 AM PDT by Publius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Sicon
This interview was in 1979. Ayn said at one point, "The most dangerous thing in this country today are the universities, because they are teaching the kind of ideas that necessarily would have to lead to the destruction of this country ."

Accurate, but a common observation by then.

In 1978, John Leboutillier came out with Harvard Hates America: The Odyssey of a Born-Again American. I actually read it at the time, and still have it somewhere.

And I think Buckley's God and Man at Yale was published in 1951.

25 posted on 08/10/2023 11:50:05 AM PDT by Angelino97
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: aquila48; Reily
In her interview on Donahue, Rand said that women were unqualified to be President, because it was not in the nature of women to command man.

Rand did support women's right to vote, and she said she'd vote for a woman running for Congress or Senate, just not for President.

26 posted on 08/10/2023 11:52:20 AM PDT by Angelino97
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Angelino97

Ayn Rand opposed all religions including the Judaism which she did fully understand—and was very open about it.


27 posted on 08/10/2023 11:53:14 AM PDT by cgbg (Claiming that laws and regs that limit “hate speech” stop freedom of speech is “hate speech”.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Angelino97

I would almost be for the opposite. Let women run for any office but don’t let them vote.

There are many good, rational women, but definitely the minority. So whereas one can find a good woman leader, the mass of women, because of their emotional nature, would more often than not pick as leader one like them, weak and emotional.

Whereas, I think men would gladly vote for a Margaret Thatcher.


28 posted on 08/10/2023 12:09:41 PM PDT by aquila48 (Do not let them make you "care" ! Guilting you is how they control you. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Publius

Thank you, Publius. I will check it out...


29 posted on 08/10/2023 12:30:05 PM PDT by rlmorel ("If you think tough men are dangerous, just wait until you see what weak men are capable of." JBP)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Angelino97

Again given the way Jews were treated in Czarist Russia I doubt she was motivated to learn anything about Christianity.


30 posted on 08/10/2023 1:13:51 PM PDT by Reily (!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: sushiman

I don’t disagree with anything she said.

With me, she was preaching to the choir.

She’s as grounded in reality, as grounding could ever possibly get.

If there’s anything I would disagree with her is on atheism. No one can be sure that there isn’t (or is) a higher being, so the more rational position is to be agnostic.

We like to think of ourselves as the highest form of creation and that what our senses reveal is all there is. But maybe an amoeba thinks the same about itself, and it will never know of our existence nor our nature.

So it’s very possible that we are to God what an amoeba is to us.


31 posted on 08/10/2023 7:35:47 PM PDT by aquila48 (Do not let them make you "care" ! Guilting you is how they control you. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sushiman

32 posted on 08/10/2023 7:37:28 PM PDT by dfwgator (Endut! Hoch Hech!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-32 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson