Skip to comments.
Historic Supreme Court case could imperil the entire US tax code
The Hill ^
| BY TRAVIS NIX, OPINION CONTRIBUTOR - 08/09/23 7:00 AM ET
Posted on 08/09/2023 11:47:18 PM PDT by RandFan
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41 next last
I believe the Income Tax is Unconstitutional however if you take this hardline position they will throw you in jail.
Many "tax prostestors" for example Irwin Schiff have learned this. He died in prison. It's not a good idea.
They will never rule against the government collecting taxes I believe even if it's technically unconstitutional ....
It sucks!
1
posted on
08/09/2023 11:47:18 PM PDT
by
RandFan
To: Amendment10
2
posted on
08/09/2023 11:49:40 PM PDT
by
RandFan
To: RandFan
is this really about tax issues of dividens
that are reinvested?
3
posted on
08/10/2023 12:00:33 AM PDT
by
RockyTx
To: RandFan
I want to see proof it was actually ratified. Little tough to believe we would do that to ourselves
To: RandFan
How is this any different then me being forced to pay taxes on “profit” my S corp made, without me ever seeing a dime?
5
posted on
08/10/2023 12:07:25 AM PDT
by
SPDSHDW
(Ron DeSantis. The latest GOPe champion in a long list of winners. Jeb! Mitt Romney, and John McStain)
To: SPDSHDW
Even being made to pay taxes on Mutual Fund “Capital Gains” is total BS.
6
posted on
08/10/2023 12:22:30 AM PDT
by
Paladin2
To: SPDSHDW
Even being made to pay taxes on Mutual Fund “Capital Gains” is total BS.
7
posted on
08/10/2023 12:22:30 AM PDT
by
Paladin2
To: I got the rope
Especially since a 3% tax on tea was enough to make you angry.
8
posted on
08/10/2023 12:43:08 AM PDT
by
Jonty30
(If liberals were truth tellers, they'd call themselves literals. )
To: Jonty30
Especially since a 3% tax on tea was enough to make you angry.Do you suppose we are more oppressed than the founding fathers?
9
posted on
08/10/2023 12:56:03 AM PDT
by
Mark17
(Retired USAF air traffic controller. Father of USAF Captain & pilot. Both bitten by the aviation bug)
Does anyone else remember the proposed simple income tax form:
1) Enter the amount you earned ____________
2) Send it in
Are we there yet???
10
posted on
08/10/2023 12:58:30 AM PDT
by
Oscar in Batangas
(An Honors Graduate from the Don Rickles School of Personal Verbal Intercourse)
To: Mark17
Unquestionably.
Prior to the Founding of America, most citizens of the continent only had to promise fealty to the King and pay your taxes.
Prior to the Revolution, the citizen here paid between 1 and 2 shillings/year. You guys didn’t have representation in the Parliament, which was the bigger complaint.
11
posted on
08/10/2023 1:01:10 AM PDT
by
Jonty30
(If liberals were truth tellers, they'd call themselves literals. )
To: Jonty30
Prior to the Founding of America, most citizens of the continent only had to promise fealty to the King and pay your taxes.Didn’t they have to quarter British soldiers too? (The quartering act) I imagine that probably didn’t make them happy either.
12
posted on
08/10/2023 1:08:49 AM PDT
by
Mark17
(Retired USAF air traffic controller. Father of USAF Captain & pilot. Both bitten by the aviation bug)
To: Mark17
I guess they did that as well.
13
posted on
08/10/2023 1:23:01 AM PDT
by
Jonty30
(If liberals were truth tellers, they'd call themselves literals. )
To: RandFan
"Oh, it's just a tax."
14
posted on
08/10/2023 1:23:46 AM PDT
by
Libloather
(Why do climate change hoax deniers live in mansions on the beach?)
To: RandFan
15
posted on
08/10/2023 1:33:51 AM PDT
by
gleeaikin
( Question authority!)
To: Mark17
We are significantly more oppressed and we are also substantially more spineless
16
posted on
08/10/2023 3:11:47 AM PDT
by
STJPII
( )
To: Libloather
F Treason John Roberts.
Almost as much the destroyer of the United States as b Hussein Osama.
17
posted on
08/10/2023 3:20:52 AM PDT
by
A strike
("The worse, the better."- Lenin (& Schwab & Soros)
To: RandFan
It’s “ the Hill,” so I’ll take its characterization of the issue with a grain of salt, but if a SCOTUS decision could really do all that, There’s no way Roberts and possibly Kavanaugh and Barrett won’t vote with the left.
To: RandFan
Chief Justice Roberts is not going to allow anything to rock the boat with the U.S. tax code. Even if an opinion was written given the plaintiff relief requested, it would be so narrowly written that it would only apply in a very limited way so as not to interfere with the tax code itself.
19
posted on
08/10/2023 3:27:46 AM PDT
by
CFW
(I will not comply!)
To: CFW
Correct. Roberts is the problem on this. The others might be sympathetic
20
posted on
08/10/2023 3:46:35 AM PDT
by
RandFan
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson