https://clinicalinfo.hiv.gov/en/glossary/reverse-transcription
So what if someone was just injected with HIV DNA? Still allow HIV to enter the CD4 cell nucleus and comine with the cell's genetic material - cell DNA? If not, why not?
Posted on 06/19/2023 12:51:31 PM PDT by ransomnote
The article does not make a direct claim of permanent DNA changes caused by the "Jab". It makes a direct claim that there is a gross amount of DNA that should not be in the compound. Why is it there and what is it doing?
The obvious point of inference left unsaid is that DNA inserted into a cell by the same mechanism that inserts RNA into the cell will make permanent changes to the cell. or there is some mechanism by which the RNA is creating the DNA.
Which was a basic point made by "ransomnote" and many others a long time ago - that previously unknown pathways would be discovered which allow reverse transcription of the spike-generator RNA of the Pfizer treatment into the cell nucleus and permanently alter the function of the cell - and all of its' descendants.
RNA is supposed to be a consumable, with a lifespan of hours to days. That spike protein generation was supposed to turn itself off after a period of time.
If the reverse transcription, or DNA contamination ideas are true, then people who took the defective (?) "hot" forms of the mRNA treatment are absolutely screwed for the rest of their lives. Their infested tissues will continue to generate toxic spike proteins as long as they live.
Does that vindicate "ransomnote" and all the others. I don't know.
I cannot find any satisfaction or vindication in another "I told you so" condition. I am more a fan of "Rope, lamppost, some assembly required" for the perpetrators. For dammed sure, we aren't going to see any justice from our "legal system".
"Everyone who participated in, everyone who benefited from it..." (Man on Fire).
https://clinicalinfo.hiv.gov/en/glossary/reverse-transcription
So what if someone was just injected with HIV DNA? Still allow HIV to enter the CD4 cell nucleus and comine with the cell's genetic material - cell DNA? If not, why not?
Shortly before his death Dr Zelenko said in an X22 interview that due to the vax causing changes to DNA, that recipients are no longer fully human.
Probably easier for RNA to get integrated in to a chromosome than DNA.
But DNA could as well.
Do any of these analyses say what the DNA is? The entire plasmid used to transcribe the spike RNA?
I have always thought there is a chance of chromosomal integration occurring from just the RNA.
That should be easy enough to have been tested for in the hundreds of millions of people who’ve got the RNA shots.
I have said that the possibility of leukemia or other cancers couldn’t be ignored.
It’s been two years plus now since the shots began. If there are going to be cancers due to chromosomal rearrangements abetted by introduction of high levels of RNA in to cells they should start showing up any time.
Bookmark for later.
Increased rates of very aggressive cancers are showing up. Whether that can be correlated with the "jab" is not clear from publicly available data. The "purebloods" seem to be getting increased rates of cancer too.
Something else may be going on. It needs looking into.
p
What a tease line you missed. {;^)
Waiting for Entropy12 to check in to sing the virtues of these horrible shots designed to kill people slowly all so he can continue to go on his cruises. Well past time to put these liars in jail for selling “smoke and mirrors” on these jabs.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.