Posted on 06/06/2023 3:29:36 PM PDT by hardspunned
.
12 m
“He seems to be unleashed.”
Did you catch when he said ....
“they tell us there are no gatekeepers here ...we’ll see”
I think he has plans to find out ... no holds barred , swing for the fence.
cool
Unfortunately, I just had a bad thought. Tucker’s 15 minutes at 6:00 pm EST, allows everyone to watch the rest of primetime on any network they choose. By the way, it seems Tucker just blew through the combined primetime viewer numbers of all cable news networks by 8:30 pm EST. The best we can hope for is people to watch Tucker first, then watch the other networks and eventually get so sick of the lies on the networks that they watch or do something else. That will take a while.
Go virtue signal for Ukraine someplace else. Only morons side with a corrupt Ukraine. There still are ZERO American interests in Ukraine.
Keep up! 🤣🤣
13.4 Million views
I wonder if that will be a nightly thing.
“I wonder if that will be a nightly thing.”
******************************
I just began to follow him. We’ll find out soon.
16.7 Million Views now.
Your scenario doesn’t connect. How does this help Ukraine take Mariupol?
The place to cut off the Russian held Zaporozhia/Kherson territories is Melitopol, IMHO. That’s the chokepoint.
It does help Russia hold these areas however, by impeding a crossing of the Dneiper. The docks, jetties, and connecting roads on the Russian side are being washed away, complicating the use of ferries. The East bank will be an extensive muddy mess. And the now-irregular flow of the Dneiper will impede the establishment of pontoon bridges, even alongside the Antonovsky bridge.
I agree with tucker.
look for the ukes to attack across the dried up lake bed.
There are no russian soldiers or fortifications on the other side.
the south side of the river is now defenseless.
Exactly right. Taking out a dam like this requires heavy explosives and properly placed. The Russians are the only one who can do this. Because they control/occupy the area of this dam.
Needlessly trolling me still has no bearing on how you demolish a dam.
Thank you. I’m not criticizing the Russians here. It’s logical to credit them with the demolition of the dam and it’s logical on their part to do it.
Like you know how to demolish a dam or have any clue who did 🤣 🤣 🤣
Odd that you attribute ignorance to me all while knowing nothing at all about me.
Peter Zeihan
@PeterZeihan
·
20h
You cannot blow up a dam with artillery. You have to use an explosive on the inside. This was definitely the Russians.
https://twitter.com/PeterZeihan/status/1666023553970450435
_____Good comments here at twitter____
Thank you. Lots of video online about removing barrage dams yet the Putinistas think that a stout Soviet era dam was flimsy enough to succumb to a few artillery shells.
Video of the dam being demolished is out now. I was right and you were wrong.
Stalin and the Soviets loved making steel and pouring concrete. Yearly stats of their output was a good measure of how the USSR economy was growing stronger.
USSR poured concrete to build their brutalist (an architectural term) apartment blocks. And they certainly poured more than enough concrete into the Kakhovka Dam. The Soviets were concrete + rebar experts.
Please provide a link to the video.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.