Posted on 04/01/2023 9:35:16 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
I thought the top picture was Trisha Yearwood 😳
She does look like her from a distance. A much younger Trisha Yearwood.
Dr. Yearwood’s answer is another example of how far The Left is divorced from reality. There’s no coming back for them and I doubt there’s any way for us to continue to live in the same country with them. The house is again as divided as it was in 1860. I don’t if the house will collapse or if one side will defeat the other in a Second Civil War, but I am certain the house will cease to be divided within the next few years.
New addition to my list of BS words and phrases.
No. The earrings means he’s a homo.
On human females it angles slightly rear ward so as not to impede a child coming through the birth canal. Hell I learned that in high school science class almost fifty years ago.
He is wearing earrings.
He does not know if he is a man or woman...
>Graduate students like Emma Palladino have objected that “the archaeologists who find your bones one day will assign you the same gender as you had at birth, so regardless of whether you transition, you can’t escape your assigned sex.”
If you put 100 women and 10 men on a hypothetical isolated island and came back in 100 years, you’d find a community of men, women, and children.
If you put 100 so-called “trans women” and 10 men on a similar island, in 100 years you’d find 110 male remains.
Science. Deal with it.
looks like a bow tie also...
Yearwood is not saying you can’t identify whether skeletons are male or female.....
he is saying the person may have identified otherwise to their biological sex, so you can’t say the skeleton is male or female.
all part of the identity politics madness.
He had to get a PHD to be so stupid.
He said “Gender”, you’re saying “Male and Female”.
This is the problem. Gender only refers to words, not people. Did Riley actually ask whether the Sex of an individual can be determined by skeletal remains?
This is why they pull shit like this, because when words no longer mean things, there is no conversation possible. A guy can cut off his wang or wear a dress, it doesn’t make him a woman or female or change his sex.
https://iied21.hccs.edu/JyotiW/BiologyLabs/AP1/05Skeletal/05PelvicImages/Pelvic_MaleFemale.png
Women have space for the birth canal...men don’t. Its a pretty distinctive difference, imho.
Hey, prof: Show me a male skeleton with parturition scars.
Yearwood has a crap Ph.D. in fake academic subjects. Pure AA hire. Next!...
He is part of the reason why I have never gone by “Dr.” It used to be that “Ph.D.” meant a person actually knew stuff worth knowing. Now every dog-and-his-grandmother has a crap Ph.D.
“Mr.” is good enough for me. “Stop the Planet of the Apes. I want off!”
The way you fight these sorts is to challenge their competencies. Publicly ask them to define “sexual dimorphism”, or ask if ANYTHING can be determined from found remains. Ask them if the subject’s class, wealth, social status, or cultural association can be determined. If they concede to the objective reality of any of these inquiries, they’ve conceded the whole and, if not, they’ve mooted their profession. Despite all their claims that sexuality is a social construct, the only thing left behind which is NOT a social construct is the biological evidence.
His PhD = his participation trophy
Famed for his “Clovis first” diktat and who used his position to shut down any researcher with contrary evidence.
If there is no differentiation between the sexes what are trans claiming to be?
“Ideology beat science under both the Soviets and under Yearwood.”
Methinks, I could now replace ‘Yearwood’ in your statement with the Unit ed States.
(that space is intentional)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.