Posted on 12/13/2022 10:19:23 AM PST by Eleutheria5
This also just in.
25-Year-Old College Football Star Dies Suddenly from Heart Attack While Jogging
https://slaynews.com/news/25-year-old-football-star-dies-suddenly-heart-attack-jogging/
The report from Australia follows the same pattern and information was solid. This has gotten real..sadly.
Pfizer’s partner, BioNTech is a German company.
All according to plan.
So the question is begged. If the vaccine kills healthy men and women in their prime, was this planned, or just stupidly overeager politicians charging blindly ahead with a new drug.
Oh, and Trump spearheaded the research and approval of the vax. Were they fooling him, too, and would he have put the brakes on as the data came in? Brandon grabbed Trump’s baby and ran with it, and doesn’t seem to care about any downside, so long as the MSM is on his side and wants him to look good, too. That much is clear.
A link to the aforementioned study...
Agreed.
But you and I both know that’s not going to happen.
Too many individuals and institutions have a vested interest in the Jab and they’re not going to even take the chance, no matter how small, that it could be shown that the Jab is responsible for a lot of problems.
It is public record that over 10,000 people have died from this shot in the United States. The swine flu vaccine in the 70s was pulled after 38 people died. That is less than a half a percent of the covid Jab. That alone should raise eyebrows. And yet anyone who brings that up is reviled as a conspiracy theorist.
I would like someone to demonstrate to me why the amount of deaths and injuries that can be linked to this shot are glossed over compared to every other vaccine that’s ever been released.
Eleutheria5 wrote: “Conspiracy theorize away. There’s a general correlation time wise. The individual cases have to be analyzed to see if they were all vaxed, and when, relative to date of death, and how healthy they were generally.”
Curious. Why not also ask if they were drug users, had COVID, etc., etc.
Hey, many other folks are making big profits off of the massive deaths - right?
.
/SSS - super sicko sarcasm
I don’t AT ALL blame Trump for the vaccines being harmful. But he was so desperate for getting the (well-deserved) credit, that in the last 2 1/2 months of his presidency, he did nothing to stop the vaccine hype from snowballing out of control, despite the fact that he should have known damned well how evil and power-crazy these people were. Fauci openly mocked him to his face in front of the news cameras, and Trump stood there like a kid who got pantsed in front of the school assembly, because he was rendered so incredibly weak.
And to be clear: I believe Trump has been proven to be innocent of just about everything the Deep State had to smear him with. But his disastrous, brainless responses to everything constantly validated the accusers to the point that none of the nonpartisan potential skeptics knows or even cares what he has been found innocent of.
When I was a little kid, I was chewing my finger nails when another kid accused me of picking my nose and eating it. Several kids believed him and started to laugh at me. So I tried to show everybody that it was a finger nail, which only triggered an explosion. I learned a lesson that day: Your innocence is irrelevant to the public; it’s how you deal with the accusations that matters. And I wonder, “How did a man get to be 72 years old and a titan of industry without learning this?”
“Why not also ask if they were drug users, had COVID, etc., etc.”
That’s all germane to how healthy they were generally.
“It is public record that over 10,000 people have died from this shot in the United States.”
Actually, it’s not. Causation an open question that the powers that be are studiously avoiding trying to answer. But the answer remains un-answered.
“But the question (of causation) remains un-answered.”
Why do these sort of reports never specify which vaccine people took? Regrettably, I took the J&J shot; I was under pressure from my employer, and I had seen troubling information about Pfizer’s and Moderna’s. I thought by taking J&J, I had found a loophole that I could live with and keep my job. Soon, I became concerned that J&J also had issues and that I had gravely underestimated how radical J&J’s technology was. But the fact remains that it *is* very different from the other two. I was hoping the fact that I took only one jab (J&J only requires one) makes it safer, but this suggests that people who took only one jab are worse off. Or does this only apply to people who needed two, but only took one? Is J&J more safe or less safe?
“The individual cases have to be analyzed to see if they were all vaxed, and when, relative to date of death, and how hea
lthy they were generally.”
That’s what they will avoid doing. Which is a hint about what is happening. Governments are unlikely release that which would really tell the populace what’s going on.
Sound observations all. I predict that in the not to greatly distant future, the international deaths resulting form these vaccines Will exceed the ability of the media to cover it up. When that day arrives, enterprising law firms will magically discover “Class action,” resulting in the total financial downfall of many players in their deadly charade - at least in a just society.
Don’t beat yourself up, dangus. It’s impossible to quantify your personal risk and that’s the way the governments want it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.