Skip to comments.
NASA cancels greenhouse gas monitoring satellite due to cost
Associated Press ^
| November 29, 2022
| Seth Borenstein
Posted on 11/30/2022 10:06:57 PM PST by Olog-hai
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-49 last
To: Olog-hai
Let me get this straight. A country that is going to spend billions on “climate reparations” doesn’t want to spend money to gather actual data?
Why don’t they want the facts? This is a complete cover-up.
41
posted on
12/01/2022 7:30:58 AM PST
by
Cincinnatus.45-70
(What do DemocRats enjoy more than a truckload of dead babies? Unloading them with a pitchfork!)
To: sloanrb
Many in NASA would have liked to cancel the rocket SLS is a kludge based on ancient technology. Many in NASA and its contractors would have liked to start over and do it right. For example, back in the early 2000s they looked at the specs and design for the Saturn V "F-1" engine ... then started over and designed an engine to EXCEED those specs using modern materials and fabrication techniques. Congress would not allow it.
42
posted on
12/01/2022 7:45:03 AM PST
by
NorthMountain
(... the right of the peopIe to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed)
To: Olog-hai
Past satellite data has showed no global warming. Odd that they canceled the CO2 monitoring satellite? Perhaps NASA really knows it is not about CO2?
It is really about the earths orbital mechanics and that fusion furnace in the sky named the sun. NASA knows this but NASA is politicized.
43
posted on
12/01/2022 8:08:48 AM PST
by
cpdiii
(CANE CUTTER-DECKHAND-ROUGHNECK-OILFIELD CONSULTANT-GEOLOGIST-PILOT-PHARMACIST)
To: Olog-hai
NASA satellite spotted a huge clouded area in infrared in Mi Ind Ill and Ohio area and sent someone to investigate it and it turned out to be very high concentrations of oxygen.
Same in most corn belt areas
Noted on What on Earth program
44
posted on
12/01/2022 9:13:44 AM PST
by
Vaduz
(LAWYERS )
To: cpdiii
The scale of the sun (you can fit 1.3 million earths into its volume; such a celestial body would be the primary driver for whatever is happening on the planet) ought to show their folly instantly.
45
posted on
12/01/2022 10:08:39 AM PST
by
Olog-hai
("No Republican, no matter how liberal, is going to woo a Democratic vote." -- Ronald Reagan, 1960)
To: Cincinnatus.45-70; All
I thought it was ironic that the chief scientist’s name was Karen St. Germain, too . . .
46
posted on
12/01/2022 10:10:36 AM PST
by
Olog-hai
("No Republican, no matter how liberal, is going to woo a Democratic vote." -- Ronald Reagan, 1960)
To: cpdiii; All
BTW, this is an illustration of how many earths can fit in the sun. The transparent ball is the sun, and the tiny blue balls are the many earths . . .
47
posted on
12/01/2022 10:15:00 AM PST
by
Olog-hai
("No Republican, no matter how liberal, is going to woo a Democratic vote." -- Ronald Reagan, 1960)
To: Olog-hai
Simple math...
The most efficient and low-cost method to “monitor” the CO2 is to have the government experts simply state what they “think” it is...
That is, and always has been, the controlling scientific method for the communist-controlled environmentalist attack on capitalism and individual freedoms...
48
posted on
12/01/2022 10:32:05 AM PST
by
SuperLuminal
(Where is the next Sam Adams when we so desperatly need him)
To: Olog-hai
49
posted on
12/01/2022 11:11:18 AM PST
by
Cincinnatus.45-70
(What do DemocRats enjoy more than a truckload of dead babies? Unloading them with a pitchfork!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-49 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson