Posted on 11/26/2022 2:58:05 PM PST by george76
Before mRNA vaxes, giving out a donut in exchange for receiving a medical procedure was considered unethical.
Because positive coercion (e.g., giving a reward) is (or was) considered coercion.
In my case, an initial dive in the history of mRNA therapies was enough for me to wait and see. mRNA therapies had never reached phase 3 trial before, they only made it to phase 2 and were stopped because of serious illness or death to human subjects.
Since then, the deceptive reporting/analysis has continued unabated. And I remain unvaxed, untested, and (as far as I know) uninfected.
Fun fact, an early (pre-vax) study showed that up to date tetanus vax boosters provided a 25% relative risk reduction for COVID. This is better than most of the COVID vaxes 90 days out from a booster shot. I had a tetanus booster in spring 2020, maybe that has contributed to me not getting covid yet. It was just a review of medical records so it was not a very strong study, but the CDC/FDA has promoted worse studies to push their agenda.
Why do you want to take away Americans' legally distinct rights?
-PJ
Political Junkie Too wrote: “No, it doesn’t fail because Comirnaty is a legally distinct drug from the one that is being distributed in the United States under the EUA.”
No, that fails as well:
“The phrase “legally distinct with certain differences,” the representative said, simply refers to differences in the documentation included in the separate regulatory submissions for emergency use authorization and full approval. For example, the submissions may have indicated different manufacturing locations or different approved materials suppliers. They emphasized that an FDA review found the EUA-authorized and FDA-approved products are equivalent. The Pfizer representative noted that this is all actually common for licensed vaccines.”
https://heavy.com/news/comirnaty-vs-pfizer-vaccine-legally-distinct/
If you want to play again, try explaining how somethings can be identical and interchangeable yet not the same things.
If it's still EUA, then the full rights of the EUA still apply.
-PJ
Political Junkie Too wrote: “Then why did they have to go the EUA route to extend its availability? If it’s still EUA, then the full rights of the EUA still apply.”
I don’t understand what you’re driving at. Please explain.
-PJ
Political Junkie Too wrote: “Sure you do. You’ve been prolific on these threads.”
I have no idea what you’re talking about.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.