Posted on 11/15/2022 12:51:01 PM PST by devane617
It’s designed to be close....with the D winning.
42,000 votes left.
18,000 to gain.
So, the final dump would have to be 18,000+ 12,000 at a minimum. That’s 30,000 votes out of 42,000. That would be a 71 v 29 win for Lake.
Of course, if Hobbs was trailing, they'd have until sometime next summer to get it "done".
Of course you believe it’s rigged.
Losing is tough. I get it.
Math is math.
Only?
Really?
Only a complete idiot has any confidence in US elections.
How many ballots in that 2%?
Kind of like when Al Franken “won” in Minnesota in 2008.
Votes that had the write in of “Mickey Mouse” and “Frankenstein” got counted as Franken votes.
The steal. Votes left were predominantly from red areas. Hobbs needed 57% of those. No Way.
How can the SoS oversee the election counting while on the ballot?
under 18k now...check the link
...and that is how Frankie won...something like 250 votes
That one guy in charge whined about 14 hour days, blah, blah.
But whenever I watched the feed most workers were just standing around.
Does the remaining 2% to be counted even have 18k votes in it?
+++++
We don’t know how many outstanding votes there are. We have had at least 2 updates with the vote count as 98%. Until we get an update to 99% any estimate of the remaining votes would be too high.
My first remaining vote calculation at 98% was 51K. So at 99% I would expect about 25k votes remaining.
I use the AZ SOS website for data and it also shows Keri behind by 18k.
Add that to the list of denying vote to qualified electors
How To Remove Communists From the Republic
See Foster v. Love (1997) SCOTUS (9-0). 'Delaly of game' in counting causes UNLAWFUL election as election results shall be published on Election Day (b4 midnite), and if not, and not a runoff condition, then UNLAWFUL election from delay affects other states' rights to fair election. Now it seems AZ used different paper lengths between mail and in-person voting, which affects (R) more than (D), and increased the adjudication rate so the ballots could be altered.
Clearly this was meant to introduce vote fraud into the election and deny voting rights to qualified citzens and other states, rendering the election UNLAWFU, null and void. Once a state judge rules their election UNLAWFUL, quo warranto actions can be filed in Fed court to remove the cheaters after they are inaugurated.
Then Congress can elect their leaders and use the 14th Amendment to remove the offending state(s) for denying its citizens the results of an fair election, and reducing its apportionment by the percentage of citizens denied their votes (everyone in a null and void election).
..and CHEATING IS CHEATING.
Prove it. In court.
The GOP needs to change its ways. They are operating horse and buggy in an airplane world.
Change GOP leadership. Get rid of the old people running the party.
And, start to consider candidates and positions that will win votes. This election was lost the day the Rowe decision was announced.
What is your alternative?
Your way doesn’t seem to be working very well.
Altrnative? First election fraud deniers need to admit there is problem.
Ummmmm, no.
The solution to this was to okay the game to win.
Hold back ten thousand votes. “Mistabulate.”
Let the Dems show their hand and give their number.
Then break out the votes. Count every vote right?
Then win.
Okay the game to win by the rules of the game given.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.