A BBC team spent a week trying to convince seven anti-vaxxers to get the Covid jab - amid their claims 'it contains deadly microchips' and is a 'plot to depopulate the Earth': So did ANY of them change their mind?

Daily Mail ^ | Donna Ferguson

[Joe Boucher]

“it’s ‘a plot to depopulate the Earth’.”?
Why are all the bad after affects being covered up?

[bagster]

BOTH of the claims IN THE HEADLINE are bug-eyed, spittle flying, “seen it myself; it come right down outta the sky big as day,” bullshyte.

Alrighty then, if you say so. I mean, who better than you would know, amirite? It's settled.

[bagster]

Yes. The cdc was correct. Caused by seamon. Good pick up.

~ gas_dr

Look, Bumpkin, gassie is on your side. Now you know you zigged when you shoulda zagged.

#YourPeople

[Georgia Girl 2]

“Neither of the two objections listed are real”

Says who?

[RFEngineer]

I clicked on the comments and they were “no longer accepting comments” and apparently not allowing anyone to read them (as I was not able to access them).

This speaks volumes about the topic. When one side shuts down discussion there is usually a reason

[DiogenesLamp]

A BBC team spent a week trying to convince seven anti-vaxxers to get the Covid jab - amid their claims 'it contains deadly microchips' and is a 'plot to depopulate the Earth': So did ANY of them change their mind?

This is a common deception technique where you use outrageous claims to disprove actual claims.

The "vaccines" (experimental gene therapy) was indeed not adequately tested before being imposed on the public.

It appears that it may be causing a massive increase in strokes and heart attacks for people who have taken it.

All that other crap is just crap.

[DiogenesLamp]

That is provably false because it has been longer than two years and there are not BILLIONS of people dead.

My recollection, and it may be incorrect, is that these "vaccines" (experimental gene therapy) were not ready until December of 2020.

If that is correct, then it hasn't been "longer than two years." It is a few months short of two years.

Not saying a billion people are going to suddenly drop dead, i'm just saying it's too early to claim definitively that the prediction is wrong.

[DiogenesLamp]

Not one person I can remember said people would be dead in 2 years.

I recall seeing that. I think it was some French doctor who was instrumental in pioneering PCR DNA techniques or some such.

I do remember him being a prominent Doctor of some sort.

[Svartalfiar]

Neither of the two objections listed is real.

Um, which two are you talking about? Just from the excerpt I see:

- contains deadly microchips
- plot to depopulate the Earth
- Can't be trusted (rather general, so you don't have to count this as a specific objection I suppose)
- harms fertility
- harms the unborn
- too rushed
- we're the guinea pigs

Do you seriously think none of these is true? Sure, the microchip one is rather ridiculous, but most of those are debatable with the lack of real information and study. Which of course, only proves the last one - everyone that takes them is one of the guinea pigs!