Posted on 08/04/2022 4:25:19 AM PDT by MtnClimber
That sounds like a good plan.
The tax most people will be concerned about will come in the form of time spent justifying every penny to, and being bullied by, government bureaucrats. It is a “tax” that someone like me is simply not made to tolerate. If there is not a red wave in November, I will have to start thinking outside the proverbial box.
The revolution is over due.
It’s all done by our elected representatives. The revolution is voting.
Seriously? Say,how is the count in maricopa?
Our loss of freedoms will come from an innocently named agency, the Internal Revenue Service. “Service!” Just how do they serve us? It’s the bureau of punishing productivity and rewarding indolence, the bureau of confiscating money earned legitimately by the sweat of one’s brow and redistributing it to those who laugh at work.
They always hide what they’re doing behind a nice sounding name. They can’t fool me, but a shallow public is easily fooled by their tactics.
Ah yes, because "voting" has worked so well hasn't it. Now, armed revolution on the other hand...
Semimojo has been a brain dead leftist troll for many years. As a result, that thing’s post is no surprise.
And the illegals won’t care about the Posse Comitatus Act when they are ordered to use deadly force against Americans.
Who's going to determine tax policy in the new revolutionary government?
No, but Lois Lerner went after conservative groups. What protections are in the bill to prevent using agents as political tools? Probably none.
I'm getting close to retirement, so I'm moving some of my savings to places where I can use what I have I earned and already paid taxes on to earn interest. For example on line banks have some decent CD rates now. Always wondering if the IRS will be harassing me to prove where all this money I'm moving has come from.
That would be us.
But how? We do that now by electing representatives. What would be different?
Spurious Lenin “quote”.
There's never been anything stopping the states from repealing the 16th (direct taxes) and 17th (citizen power to vote for federal senators) Amendments (16&17A), except for inexcusably widespread ignorance of the federal government's constitutionally limited powers as the delegates to the Constitutional Convention had intended for those powers to be understood.
"Congress is not empowered to tax for those purposes which are within the exclusive province of the States." —Justice John Marshall, Gibbons v. Ogden, 1824.
The congressional record shows that Rep. John Bingham, the main author of Section 1 of the 14th Amendment, had clarified that the delegates to the Constitutional Convention had left the care of the people uniquely to the states, not the feds.
”Simply this, that the care of the property, the liberty, and the life of the citizen, under the solemn sanction of an oath imposed by your Constitution, is in the States and not in the federal government [emphases added]. I have sought to effect no change in that respect in the Constitution of the country.” —John Bingham, Congressional. Globe. 1866, page 1292 (see top half of third column)
"From the accepted doctrine that the United States is a government of delegated powers, it follows that those not expressly granted, or reasonably to be implied from such as are conferred, are reserved to the states, or to the people. To forestall any suggestion to the contrary, the Tenth Amendment was adopted. The same proposition, otherwise stated, is that powers not granted are prohibited [emphasis added]." —United States v. Butler, 1936.
Repealing 16&17A will effectively "secede" ALL the states from the unconstitutionally big federal government.
Patriots need to start working with their Trump-endorsed state lawmaker candidates ASAP to repeal 16&17A.
IRStapo
IRStapo
They can start by answering their mail.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.