Georgia election officials dispute film’s voter fraud claims (Ruby Freeman not mentioned)

AP News ^ | 5/17/22 | Sudhin Thanawala

[rlmorel]

"...A ballot harvested vote might be a perfectly legal vote,” he said. “It’s just the manner of its delivery was illegal...”

What a completely asinine statement. This thought process would be just as valid in a variety of ways:

• The money in the envelope for the protection racket is perfectly legal money, but the way it got there was illegal.

• The car in the garage is a perfectly legal car, how the stolen vehicle got there is illegal.

• The sex that man and woman engaged in is perfectly legal, how they did it is illegal.

[rlmorel]

"...We saw the glorious high definition video footage from government cameras of mules illegally stuffing ballot after ballot after ballot into unattended drop boxes in which that same video footage was time-stamp synchronized to the GPS tracks of individual phones which went from ballot box, to ballot box, to ballot box..."

There are some, including many Republicans and people on Free Republic, to whom no amount of evidence will be enough. The documented behavior shown in that graphic above was not just one example, it was performed repeatedly for weeks, by thousands of individual cell phones being tracked, in the five battleground states mentioned..

The people who would deny the import of what this graphic above shows are the type of people who would look at this graphic of the track of an individual cell phone going from dropbox to dropbox at 2 AM, with time-stamped synchronized video footage taken from official state-owned cameras, and would say something absurd like "How do we know this person isn't just going to and from work?", "How do we know the person isn't dropping off ballots for a relative?" or "How do we know the person isn't going to and from a convenience store at 2 AM to get some pickles for his pregnant wife?" and so on.

Some people are so weak-minded that they refuse to see the truth when it is staring them in the face, like that graphic above, similar patterns of which were displayed thousands of times, over multiple days, in weeks/months leading up to the election, in every battleground state.

Yet to those people, any suggestion of malfeasance is hogwash. Until someone screams out a Perry Mason-like public confession of election illegality, it won't be enough, and will never be enough.

Those types of people feel empowered to talk about the 2000 Mules documentary without ever having seen it.

[moovova]

“There are some, including many Republicans and people on Free Republic, to whom no amount of evidence will be enough.”

I was already completely convinced the 2020 election was stolen...before the film came out. The film is just the “cherry on top”. LOL.

I’m also convinced Dems will steal 2024.

[TheCipher]

I agree. I didn’t mean to imply by my comment that I thought those were legitimate votes. I was just pointing out the moronic excuse this jerkoff was making. Even if they were all “legal” , which we know they were not, they couldn’t be valid.

[rlmorel]

I didn’t see anything in your post that indicated you thought they were legitimate…I saw what you were driving at!

[rlmorel]

I am in exactly the same spot you are. Sadly.

Exactly.

[Georgia Girl 2]

Let the frauding continue. 😣

[kiryandil]

Let's resurrect this little gem from December last:

Note who is scoffing at Catherine Engelbrecht, and the date.

This is his style. Smirk and scoot, never paying the freight for his agitprop.

He's doing the same with you.

[x]

I’m sure the Democrats did cheat. But the most that comes out of disputed elections is that there was cheating, not that it flipped the results. It probably did, but that’s what’s hard or impossible to prove in court.

[Organic Panic]

These fraudsters VIDEOED themselves cheating and bragging about it.

[centurion316]

Politicians of all parties, election officials, and government bureaucrats at every level have no credibility on this issue. I do not believe any of them and I am convinced that they want the current flawed system because it has been carefully engineered to favor them rather than the legally registered voter. Are there honest ones out there. Yes, but they are rare.

[subterfuge]

“Shut up”! they explained.

[rlmorel]

I know what you mean, but I am less sanguine about action than I am that the documentary clearly displayed the truth of the election fraud..

I thought the 200 Mules documentary was both compelling and conclusive. I think they did it correctly, setting the bar for judging movements of mules engaged in illegal actions very high (10 drobboxes visited as well as the location of a non-profit stash house) and showing even that high bar would have changed the election.

If they lowered the bar (admitting the patterns of mules who visited say, 7 ballot drop boxes instead of ten ballot drop boxes, the election was a Trump rout of Biden. In the official surveillance video that was both available, clear enough, and coincided with the GPS data, they could count the number of votes being stuffed into the boxes on average. if they saw that these mules were making x amount of trips, visiting y amount of boxes, and depositing z amounts of ballots, they could make a good estimate of the votes being introduced. The assumption these votes were all for Biden is a valid one.

Very well done. I thought it was well produced, the intro was nicely constructed with effects and music, and the logical presentation of the issue, followed by the various data elements used, layering and time synching the video evidence they obtained, how it affected the election, and ending with where they got the ballots from.

It was compelling to see the videoed reaction from the family of the elderly woman in the nursing home who has been in a mostly unresponsive state for years (according to the family sitting with her) to recount how astonished they were to find she had been voting in elections.

The led the observer along, deliberately explaining things (even some simple things they didn’t need to) and allowed most people to understand.

I was very impressed. If someone can explain how the data can be misinterpreted in some way, I would be willing to listen, but I think this is solid work. What are they going to do-say the tracking data is invalid? D’Souza can say “Sure. Here is who we purchased data from. The same place that the Georgia State Police or the Philadelphia District Attorney gets their data from. Have at it.”

Perhaps they might say that the video footage, time-synched with the cell phone footage was misleading? The video is the authentic property of the states legally obtained via allowable citizen requests and such.

And when you look at the pattern, repeated verbatim (NGO pickup points>>mules making rounds>>mules stuffing boxes with small numbers of ballots over time) over all the key battleground states, I think their research passed the bar.

[Bshaw]

Georgia State Election Board Chairmen Matt Mashburn can be reached at the following number: (404) 656-2871

Matt wishes to swat away credible election integrity evidence that paints GA in a poor light. Wonder why?

[marktwain]

“A ballot harvested vote might be a perfectly legal vote,” he said. “It’s just the manner of its delivery was illegal.”

No. An illegally delivered vote is an illegal vote. There is no way to know is provenance or to have a chain of custody.

[marktwain]

-- a ballot doesn't lose its legitimacy just because the wrong person drops it in a box. --

Oh yes it does. You cannot know if it is legal if the wrong person drops it off. So it has to be eliminated.

Very easy to alter votes, once they are in unaccountable hands. Just place a slight mark near any votes for Trump, for example.

The vote then becomes disputed, and not counted.

Or, collect ballots from people who are not interested in voting, and fill out the ballots for them.

Illegally delivered votes are illegal votes.