Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Possible Identification of the SCOTUS Leaker (Via Twitter)
Twitter feed of Will Chamberlain ^ | May 3, 2022 | Will Chamberlain

Posted on 05/06/2022 6:30:12 AM PDT by Yo-Yo

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-78 next last
To: Krosan

You can’t disbar someone that isn’t a lawyer.


21 posted on 05/06/2022 6:53:33 AM PDT by EEGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Yo-Yo

Clerks are not lawyers.


22 posted on 05/06/2022 6:54:22 AM PDT by EEGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: EEGator

All Supreme Court clerks are lawyers and almost exclusively from the Ivies.


23 posted on 05/06/2022 6:55:01 AM PDT by Krosan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Yo-Yo

Maybe this POS:

https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/4060032/posts


24 posted on 05/06/2022 6:55:47 AM PDT by rktman (Destroy America from within? Check! WTH? Enlisted USN 1967 to end up with this? 😕)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Yo-Yo

“will soon get rich from the speaking fees and book deals”

A lot of competition in that circle already. They’d have to push some existing player out and Ivy law-nerds don’t have the charisma for that.


25 posted on 05/06/2022 6:56:29 AM PDT by Krosan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Yo-Yo

Earlier in the week someone was speculating on a Justice Sotomayor clerk. Well, speculate away, I hope the culprit is found before the end of the coming weekend. Personally, they should lock up all of the 46-odd people that had access to the draft and let them talk and solve the problem of who leaked it. Can they lie-detector test them very focused to see?


26 posted on 05/06/2022 6:59:10 AM PDT by Reno89519 (FJB. Respect America, Embrace America, Buy American, Hire American.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EEGator

I believe the “clerks” for Supreme Court Justices are indeed generally young attorneys.


27 posted on 05/06/2022 6:59:53 AM PDT by KC Burke (If all the world is a stage, I would like to request my lighting be adjusted.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Yo-Yo

Guilty!


28 posted on 05/06/2022 7:00:26 AM PDT by G Larry (Anybody notice that Satan is hard at work?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Yo-Yo

Eric Ciaramella was unavailable for comment.


29 posted on 05/06/2022 7:03:44 AM PDT by drSteve78 (Je suis Deplorable STILL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Krosan; Yo-Yo

You’re correct, I was wrong.
I can’t tell from reading if they have passed the Bar or not, as it states they’re typically recent Law School grads.

I could have sworn I read the opposite the day after the leaked memo...


30 posted on 05/06/2022 7:04:14 AM PDT by EEGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Yo-Yo
I think this goes beyond the pale and should rightfully bother all justices and party hacks that their private deliberations are exposed. What if next it is Sotomayor's deliberations revealed, maybe showing overt bias and bigotry trumping legal reasoning? It will only confirm what we already know, but putting it on public display would be damaging, maybe lead to calls for her to recuse herself or resign.

Someone violated the trust they were given, they need to be found and held fully accountable. Otherwise, they system and trust fail and we will see repeats.

31 posted on 05/06/2022 7:04:34 AM PDT by Reno89519 (FJB. Respect America, Embrace America, Buy American, Hire American.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: EEGator

Clerks are not lawyers.

Clerks are not PRACTICING lawyers, perhaps, but absolutely are lawyers.


32 posted on 05/06/2022 7:06:38 AM PDT by drSteve78 (Je suis Deplorable STILL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: KC Burke

You’re correct.
I looked up SCOTUS “internship”, not “clerk” the other day.

Internship:
Applicants must be U.S. Citizens.

Applicants must have completed two semesters of undergraduate study and meet one of the following criteria:
Actively enrolled in an academic program concurrent with the internship term;
Returning to a degree program immediately following the internship term; or
Participating in a federal fellowship program.

Law students are not eligible to participate in the Supreme Court Internship Program.

Preference will be given to applicants prepared to work eight-hour days, five days per week. Some offices may accept interns available less than full time but at least four days per week.

Interns selected for the fall and spring terms should plan to work for 16 weeks. Summer interns are expected to work for at least 12 weeks.


33 posted on 05/06/2022 7:08:36 AM PDT by EEGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: drSteve78

I looked up internship, not clerks the other day.


34 posted on 05/06/2022 7:09:15 AM PDT by EEGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Yo-Yo

Her LinkedIn is gone now.


35 posted on 05/06/2022 7:10:27 AM PDT by EEGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EEGator

Now she’s LinkedOut....


36 posted on 05/06/2022 7:11:41 AM PDT by nascarnation (Let's Go Brandon!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

Comment #37 Removed by Moderator

To: EEGator

Well, if her LinkedIn is gone, that’s suspicious.

Let’s see where the investigation goes.


38 posted on 05/06/2022 7:15:00 AM PDT by Dilbert San Diego
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Yo-Yo

What is the “Democracy Team? its in the announcement.

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FR4ZOS8XwAEkYyt?format=jpg&name=small


39 posted on 05/06/2022 7:15:05 AM PDT by Nifty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dilbert San Diego

It’s suspicious, but you can send messages on LinkedIn.
I have a feeling she got a lot of messages.
She should take off for a while, and not be at her place...


40 posted on 05/06/2022 7:18:01 AM PDT by EEGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-78 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson