Posted on 04/23/2022 9:58:08 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
3, 2, 1...
3, 2, 1...
Or maybe 6, 4, 2...
Darn phone 🤳
MISINFORMATION....MISINFORMATION...MISINFORMATION....
all the fact-checkers show that the increased heart problems are caused by eating too many eggs, or asparagus, or English Peas.....yeah....that’s the ticket..it’s all caused by English Peas...
FOLLOW THE SCIENCE!!!
or 0, -1, -2... lol
LOL
So since the beginning of all this covid crap....the minister of information has done a great job of flooding the media with EVERYTHING but focusing on who funded and kept developing this UNNATURAL to humans virus....we have some serious satanic M,frs running the world. The stones in Georgia ring a bell to any of you Freepers? The Uber wealthy of the world are under the belief that they are Gods,no other explanation as far as I can see.
https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamacardiology/fullarticle/2791253
"Myocarditis after mRNA vaccination was rare in this study cohort and even among young males. The risk of myocarditis following the mRNA vaccines has been evaluated by the US Food and Drug Administration, which concluded that the benefits of vaccination outweigh the risks and fully authorized the use of mRNA-1273 in persons 18 years or older and BNT162b2 in persons 16 years or older. In addition, BNT162b2 is authorized for emergency use in children 5 years or older.
The European Medicines Agency concluded that the benefits of vaccination outweigh the risks and approved mRNA-1273 for use in persons 12 years or older and BNT162b2 for those 5 years or older. In addition, a comment published by the American College of Cardiology24 evaluated vaccine-associated myocarditis risk and concluded that the benefits of vaccination outweigh the risks.
As of January 2022, there have been nearly 5.8 million deaths associated with COVID-19 worldwide since the start of the pandemic. All currently available SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccines are highly effective against severe COVID-19 and provide some protection against transmission and infection. There is some evidence that the mRNA-1273 vaccine, possibly owing to its higher concentration of mRNA, is associated with increased immunogenicity and effectiveness. This more profound immune response could be one reason for the higher risk of myocarditis, but this hypothesis needs to be investigated further.
"There are also some limitations of the study. We defined events as an inpatient hospital admission with a corresponding main or secondary discharge diagnosis of myocarditis or pericarditis. Diagnostic codes have been shown to have 85% positive predictive value among patients younger than 60 years. Thus, without access to data on clinical measures, such as troponin levels, diagnostic imaging results, and endomyocardial biopsy, we studied myocarditis as diagnosed in clinical practice and could therefore not assess how many of these patients fulfilled all criteria for receiving a myocarditis diagnosis.
However, the median hospital length of stay was 4 to 5 days for both unvaccinated and vaccinated patients, enabling sufficient time for adequate diagnostic procedures and indicative of no difference in disease severity between vaccinated and unvaccinated cases.
"Deaths were rare, with no deaths of persons younger than 40 years. Our findings in children aged 12 to 15 years were limited to relatively few exposed individuals because vaccination in this age group only recently started in most countries."
"Although studies on the long-term prognosis of vaccine-associated cases of myocarditis are lacking and are urgently needed, some evidence suggests that the 28-day risk of death, hospital readmission rates, and development of heart failure appear low, especially in the younger age groups"
"Our data are compatible with 4 to 7 excess events within 28 days per 100 000 vaccinees after a second dose of BNT162b2, and 9 to 28 excess events within 28 days per 100 000 vaccinees after a second dose of mRNA-1273. The risk of myocarditis associated with vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 must be balanced against the benefits of these vaccines."
And given the vaccine doesn’t work to stop transmission or spread there should be no vaccine mandates, private or public.
Yes, but will the government/media allow the uninformed to learn this information?
I’ll answer: OF COURSE, NOT.
I think of the Georgia Guide Stones from time-to-time.
It definitely shows how they think.
© 2022 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.
“This cohort study of 23.1 million residents across 4 Nordic countries showed higher rates of myocarditis and pericarditis within 28 days after being vaccinated with SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccines compared with being unvaccinated.”
“The risks of myocarditis and pericarditis were highest within the first 7 days of being vaccinated, were increased for all combinations of mRNA vaccines, and were more pronounced after the second dose.”
“A second dose of mRNA-1273 [Moderna vaccine] had the highest risk of myocarditis and pericarditis, with young males aged 16 to 24 years having the highest risk.”
Given its not actually a vaccine at all. Its a gene therapy. And its been shown to modify cellular dna and travel to places in the body they said it would never travel to.
Dr. Peter McCullough, Dallas cardiologist, received warning from the American Board of Internal Medicine that he could lose his certification for spreading vaccine misinformation.
3 . . . 2 . . . 1 . . .
The Uber wealthy of the world are under the belief that they are Gods,no other explanation as far as I can see.
________________________________
They’re only the visible ones who act as though they run things. Check with DoD, DARPA, DTRA, and Space Force for whose really behind this experiment on homo sapiens.
Well, that only proves that the vaxx was working, right?
Ri-ight?!
A significant chance of contracting a heart disease on one hand, or getting a mild case of the "sniffles" on the other.
Hmm, decisions, decisions!
Regards,
“Given its not actually a vaccine at all. Its a gene therapy.”
Yes, it’s a gene therapy vaccine, or at least meant to be a vaccine.
“And its been shown to modify cellular dna”
Yes, but only in a transformed cell line. Not in people. I do think it’s a concern that it may do this with leukemia as a consequence.
“and travel to places in the body they said it would never travel to.”
I’ve heard this but I’m not sure who said it wouldn’t travel about the body or why. The circulatory system is very efficient and chemicals injected intramuscularly get just about everywhere, exceptions are the brain for example where not everything gets to due the the blood brain barrier.
Overall this gene therapy vaccine, all three, seem to have failed.
But they won’t admit it and pretend they work.
Gene therapy is not a vaccine. Its gene therapy.
Vaccines are not gene therapy, they dont modify cellular dna. The fact they had to deliberately change the definition of vaccine to slide this into it and attempt to call it such proves it isn’t.
The damn things should never have been approved.
The SwineFlu vaxx in 76/77 was pulled after killing fewer than three dozen people.
But CoupFlu policy has NEVER been about public health, has it...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.