Posted on 04/04/2022 4:18:04 PM PDT by BenLurkin
“An Eye for an Eye” was the bedwetting “liberal” standard of the time, believe it or not.
It was considered the reasonable, proportionate response, because formerly they would wipe out your entire family. Viewed in context an eye for an eye is pretty decent.
An eye for an eye was God’s idea.
But it also prevented massive over retaliation.
It ensured justice without the fear of revenge taking over and perverting justice by over doing it.
I vote for: you have mixed it up.
There you have it so we would own FFFAuci’s body. Now, what do we do with that? Not in my garden.
:>)
This “getting high” pharmaceutical business was all the rage with my generation—about 1967. It’s increased to to where it’s legal in some states—even when mixed with alcohol.
“Shrooms”, advocated by a 1990s forum member, are now blamed for even more fatalities—including that forum member. (Not FR, who have more sense).
People wonder where this country’s going?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.