Posted on 03/19/2022 5:13:36 AM PDT by O6ret
I won’t take that one either. It’s dangerous also
Novavax is an old-school vaccine, not MRNA.
Word is it will be approved in the US very soon. At this point I don’t know who would be interested in it (other than for international travel issues), but if so that’s the way to go.
I suspect that, like with Iverwhatcit, as soon as an alternative to the fake/emergency vaxxes become available their “license” will be invalid.
Midterms are approaching. Politicos need campaign contributions and the taxpayer $$ to Pharm make that happen.
What about doctors’ advice?
https://www.cnbc.com/2018/02/22/medical-errors-third-leading-cause-of-death-in-america.html
Propaganda source Wall Street Journal also published this behind their paywall - could be the typical lie of omission from the poster.
jdsteel wrote: “Many things wrong with the study and it does not negate all of the studies that show effectiveness of Ivermectin (or HCQ) plus Zinc, Vitamin C & D and an antibiotic.”
All the studies? Evidently those studies that showed effectiveness had some very serious flaws. From the article I posted:
“But most studies showing positive effects had significant limitations such as small sample sizes or poorly defined outcomes, according to the NIH. Several studies on ivermectin have been withdrawn from publication, including a randomized controlled trial looking at 100 patients in Lebanon that was retracted by the journal Viruses due to issues with the statistical analysis, according to the journal.”
Sounds good!
The flaws are with the study you refer to in the WSJ.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.